From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers! Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:45:50 +0000 Message-ID: <20201121124550.GB11643@ACM> References: <20201119104035.GB6259@ACM> <9aacff47-8ac2-93a2-5112-6153ee986b57@gmx.at> <20201120210005.GA1034@ACM> <20201121102751.GA11643@ACM> <18a901b8-3250-b461-eb2a-c13988616e93@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8654"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: enometh@meer.net, Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii , Andrii Kolomoiets , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 21 13:46:27 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kgSHb-00029S-Kf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 13:46:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49498 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgSHa-0007B7-MI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 07:46:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33102) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgSH5-0006ij-Nh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 07:45:55 -0500 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:59503 helo=mail.muc.de) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgSH3-000379-E8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 07:45:55 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 50409 invoked by uid 3782); 21 Nov 2020 12:45:50 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p4fe15360.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.225.83.96]) by localhost.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 13:45:50 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 13538 invoked by uid 1000); 21 Nov 2020 12:45:50 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18a901b8-3250-b461-eb2a-c13988616e93@gmx.at> X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de Received-SPF: pass client-ip=193.149.48.1; envelope-from=acm@muc.de; helo=mail.muc.de X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:259523 Archived-At: Hello, Martin. On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 12:55:41 +0100, martin rudalics wrote: > > Here's a quick and dirty patch to minibuf.c which appears to fix the bug, > > but I haven't given it much testing yet: > This will still fail when read_minibuf, triggered from any frame but the > minibuffer frame, exits with minibuf_level > 0. (i) I start emacs -Q --load=foo.el (ii) C-x 5 2 ; this leaves three frames, one being the minibuffer frame. (iii) C-x b ; leaves point in the minibuffer. (iv) C-x 5 o ; moves to the other normal frame. (v) C-r C-x 8 RET SPACE RET ; invokes a recursive minibuffer At this stage, point is in the minibuffer, exactly as after (iii). I don't see this as a failure. Where do you see the failure happening with that quick and dirty patch? > martin -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).