From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vasilij Schneidermann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2020 14:50:31 +0200 Message-ID: <20201011125031.GC6784@odonien.localdomain> References: <30addebe-999b-c1cc-a8d8-27aba3fac566@gmx.com> <4a1188f8-9864-54c0-ae6f-5f32102d9757@gmx.com> <20201011073553.GA6784@odonien.localdomain> <20201011120840.GC2923@protected.rcdrun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38426"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Adrien Brochard , Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jean Louis Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 11 14:52:00 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kRapU-0009sa-EI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 14:52:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33564 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRapT-0006TR-Hu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 08:51:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58488) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRaoF-0005ZH-Tt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 08:50:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mout-p-102.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.152]:10262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRaoC-00036Q-3r; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 08:50:43 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-102.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C8M9R3CdLzQkm5; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 14:50:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Original-Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by hefe.heinlein-support.de (hefe.heinlein-support.de [91.198.250.172]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id dPdy6Tyl3Pqq; Sun, 11 Oct 2020 14:50:32 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Followup-To: Jean Louis , Richard Stallman , Adrien Brochard , emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201011120840.GC2923@protected.rcdrun.com> X-Rspamd-Score: -3.55 / 15.00 / 15.00 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6725317E6 X-Rspamd-UID: 482232 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=80.241.56.152; envelope-from=mail@vasilij.de; helo=mout-p-102.mailbox.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/11 08:50:35 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257359 Archived-At: --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline > Does MELPA contains non-free software? No, it doesn't. Neither does the website contain non-free JS, it runs fine with LibreJS. The only concern here is that MELPA does not adhere to GNU's coding guidelines, such as never ever referring, linking or otherwise supporting non-free software (for example by hosting packages that wrap non-free executables or are tied into working with non-free operating systems). And why should they, they are not GNU, they are a community-provided package archive and a wildly successful one, too. Even if it contained non-free software, this is beside the point. What use is a survey if it doesn't strive to accurately capture the status quo and instead basks in ideological purity? --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEE0dAcySl3bqM8O17WFmfJg6zCifoFAl+C/5cACgkQFmfJg6zC ifqxIQf/cpvneVmF7n2dfj3HPQrQinKK1z0KBLcoiuyWRvKCWiErMjnshga77XFc PKnCJRlSD5TRwpgYF5tcIGggWGFNxHxmw/BAJs7bS9ct+i5fn2tbicWAd/d6pJ8r jzQsuKRWFH2RO5fxW7Z/fsoRBngBjMW9F/SgKhszSgMVc457l7c6Gt6ZRzOvKrjl H4CDAcb/RUHzpMeqnteejEmSJDQZdm2G7ApgWiKgtOv/Luqv6BLgt5rP8gN3kY9O k7Z7ydr9UXzzJJZJ/VeD/sLSgon+GWTtTHFurrn8mKhnMY/KyhTb+vMQNOV95qx4 8AHMWoTdHq5l2bKsfqIxxm3BYNUu6w== =/2pD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr--