On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 07:15:15PM +0300, Jean Louis wrote: > * tomas@tuxteam.de [2020-10-01 18:20]: > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 05:39:29PM +0300, Jean Louis wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > As long as dict database of Wiktionary exists, as I think, by the > > > license, it should exist, so I have asked the webmaster to tell me > > > about that. > > > > I think all those questions are answered in their web pages. The > > license(s) are here [1]. The download question is in the FAQ [2]: > > > > "Q: Is it possible to download Wiktionary? > > > > A: Yes. https://dumps.wikimedia.org/enwiktionary/ should have > > the latest copy of the main namespace. The cleanest navigation > > page is https://dumps.wikimedia.org/. Just download a > > *-articles.xml.bz2 file and some software to read it (for > > *nix, for Windows). > > > > (The "for *nix..." are actually links to software). > > I have tried that, I did not find RFC 2229 format there. When I > mentioned "dict database" I was referring to RFC 2229 standard. Do you > know the link to such database? Wait, RFC 2229 is a protocol description, not a storage format description? So the wikimedia dump format would be irrelevant here, I guess. Related, but not quite on-topic, there seems to be an effort towards providing a dict interface to the wiktionary itself, so if you want to help there [1], I'm sure they'll appreciate. Cheers [1] https://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposal:Dictionary_extensions - t