From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vasilij Schneidermann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: NonGNU ELPA Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:41:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20200915064138.GF1346@odonien.localdomain> References: <2230445.gl5ngIzrzN@terra> <87h7s0sr5w.fsf@gkayaalp.com> <875z8fy6oo.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="U3BNvdZEnlJXqmh+" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12894"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: =?utf-8?B?R8ODwrZrdHXDhD8=?= Kayaalp , rms@gnu.org, tmt_vdl@gmx.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Mingde (Matthew) Zeng" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 15 08:42:33 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kI4fg-0003EQ-Uh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:42:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50696 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kI4ff-0002nM-UO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 02:42:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56872) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kI4ez-00024v-PB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 02:41:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.171]:21476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kI4ew-0007E4-Jf; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 02:41:49 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:105:465:1:1:0]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BrDCp1gvszQkKx; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:41:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Original-Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by hefe.heinlein-support.de (hefe.heinlein-support.de [91.198.250.172]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id NegVc_Qs-PGR; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 08:41:39 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Followup-To: "Mingde (Matthew) Zeng" , rms@gnu.org, =?utf-8?B?R8ODwrZrdHXDhD8=?= Kayaalp , tmt_vdl@gmx.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <875z8fy6oo.fsf@posteo.net> X-Rspamd-Score: -5.73 / 15.00 / 15.00 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 29B8617E9 X-Rspamd-UID: 81be91 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=80.241.56.171; envelope-from=mail@vasilij.de; helo=mout-p-201.mailbox.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/15 02:41:42 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255708 Archived-At: --U3BNvdZEnlJXqmh+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline > I see how it differs from MELPA, but I still don't quite understand > why would an user want to use this instead of MELPA, which is more > popular, less strict than ELPA and doesn't require a copyright > assignment. There won't be a copyright assignment part, see the original proposal you've linked to. However the package will still need to adhere to certain rules to ensure the user freedoms, something that far from all MELPA packages do. Vasilij --U3BNvdZEnlJXqmh+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEE0dAcySl3bqM8O17WFmfJg6zCifoFAl9gYhkACgkQFmfJg6zC ifq7rQgAgRa7rIu52Max4iuQEtHchyhOA30NOB2ahEG2y8oCF/Ecaw3tEAJCMkwI +xqsb5kguN+lptZWf0nR/UPd57Qr5KHOhRn/B/JfKEGDkPrRVBz6wfyejZb6nmML F/gUN10OKPUW1X6v7kE4aHmH9In7S2/wDVX83rXE0ggSYeitIFBHrYjbv0ExjhTn Glf0TCZIpc/oKgD2/j+xfpeuV7Hk/1uQHncs6id44xuKMKCwK9czpmhoAkeZc0LQ 0Re4ovSBtFKoVuLtX8DwtsZA3dLgdb/P8ThKrMsfT0gNv68WHJLj6P6g6Fwk2Fbh ytFfQUQvHMo0pQ2Z9b2rhmhhiN1zlA== =cdTK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --U3BNvdZEnlJXqmh+--