From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ergus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28" Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 18:28:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20200908162825.2qttqqkgyjcsauwd@Ergus> References: <20200907180812.5tfylspp7i6vl4o3@Ergus> <94fda087-a61b-356d-4bb4-791907593246@yandex.ru> <24302cf8-5ac8-4abd-83ce-3e33c51a8beb@default> <83k0x4mjsv.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfhkl2r4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34452"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "Alfred M. Szmidt" , Amin Bandali , emacs-devel , nicola.manca85@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru, Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams To: Thibaut Verron Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 08 18:29:20 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgUg-0008nr-VG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 18:29:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33486 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgUg-0000X2-1D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:29:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46132) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgU1-0008UL-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:28:37 -0400 Original-Received: from sonic308-2.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com ([74.6.130.41]:41836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgU0-0000Tr-0U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:28:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aol.com; s=a2048; t=1599582514; bh=2Vtmqy7m1wFBuhbzhPzYbnbXjCJLVhdkqk7/zlTmNFo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=mxiolXBGtOcsL9Rmck1TVHwY7Q2j0mnAm9eRwGIz6UXtTyTWx/riSWI95+w3MV97VC0TqU4ZHZP1KAFd9VR7geZkKmA1wPN/kUAeVsOQKnh2+LYGmjYDf2lRAYE0q3vYStURGmJtCZ3Rl1jsH7QgLYoJLQcCZzuXgXOGeKH0ITdPYu3uVEfK85aSOmkQXaz1VUejpCE1H/gYq4lng7uukM36ydh4l5TPnrEWdLTQIeW0dtAOTaOAd1ifN7HWsqh7adYlIAsqtAg9ChNShlo4yliYtv1kUDPLUxkEC2FNNcSpKTA5cY0rOzESC5Wj6Tvno56vPL/MyF0B/5BCpDGHug== X-YMail-OSG: V.KIdA4VM1liFHEMMnPczhvJyv1SXKbVHWmu.j_yb3VUDWIje6F0lmcS6xz.OIl 4FENcWbofWS2pSjfgqVUGxdGUUr.YikAMGN8PQxaxAECqR.qvt6E9D8vdp7a_9.QJLfqXHpuHCzl 0vZYIwBpp60PSmLq.IG2ZjvBnkoRJi8nltrpX887gnBV0HsfW23f1DyO.t7HoukkH1dzTgzh6OZX mMhB01A7mxtcOGXJTTSCu4lSTZWQ1QAWOONzBgsgvgOK8yLQMywTiFd0cD.krzReTZMjY2Z9ojO9 xZdADI5B4BB9bt5iLZLXhb9m28VO8tRe8f1wuTttwYWtPCYyl4tqtY98p6tGtV3uwRv3op0vsnWg 5nfnHSY0Lfpye_DVRzlY8_4Nwzedo7eYRQRungP0kwnl9PsK011SGNRmvz3Z8H96annoRIcDcq30 FrMRvXYhr9ry9zNdYlwAV4zihYHwgijgTOeMUAKZ2B2GLK7cmGQZ2ddpbP_16PzX8HajeyvT3vXR mDb15XbTpqfI7ZhbZs9ZjykKRz7qoeBtepXaWqsV9cYGeT7TDZcvsHOibwaIjKMr2vmp1Y13Cewd AsMf0vxTcHcqTeyRBPCJTmqXHBOeLijlqSRPnEHxjv18ndeksDzpq2HayFjj.6D8AskujQheYuDH mnjHiioxjTtLsJrLKTCX9uoAA6JqnhuHRywUJPo4ssAPp05eeZwa9O3aoVyLKiVK8wB88.5fSdSg UESm9B_2bsEX8p8F.SQhYd0rC0J9d2AI2SoOeEu4zYrXkL6bCK6WsMSfEZ0gW8OTBtY3zYg982rj fBWlgahMqldFVi9Fg8aCpiEMELUSUK9qI_jC80fyKX Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic308.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 16:28:34 +0000 Original-Received: by smtp415.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (VZM Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 87472f141c5a82539212eed51b770e71; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.16565 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.aol Apache-HttpAsyncClient/4.1.4 (Java/11.0.7) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.6.130.41; envelope-from=spacibba@aol.com; helo=sonic308-2.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/08 12:20:49 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254767 Archived-At: On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:18:44PM +0200, Thibaut Verron wrote: >If the only point is to be able to do undo and redo easily, I believe that >the >problem is already solved by undo-only and undo-only-redo. Would giving >undo-only-redo (if not done already) a default binding break anybody's >workflow? > The problem is a bit trickier (I think) because undo-only/undo-only-redo comes in pair (please correct me if I am wrong) so we need bindings for the two. >Le mar. 8 sept. 2020 � 17:54, Alfred M. Szmidt a �crit : > >> It seems that suggesting totally radical changes without any kind of >> though is all the rage. There are enough subtelities in how undo >> works in emacs that, yes, the vast majority would find it annoying and >> unusable if it was changed to something like undo-tree. >> >>