From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 68ae6fa: Improved light/dark colour predicate (bug#41544) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:22:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20200612162237.GA29484@tuxteam.de> References: <20200610181238.9796.44750@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200610181239.947C4204DF@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <93F81C41-E774-4C02-9E9D-5B2CD1F66445@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="29488"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 12 18:23:21 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jjmSf-0007eF-1L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:23:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46978 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jjmSe-0002St-3K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:23:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36738) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jjmS8-00020M-LI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:22:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:49404) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jjmS6-0003yM-Bo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:22:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:Date; bh=nm00zW2BbVUm58n1faLA3zaABHY8ux3GVfk5rn7E15w=; b=XyztBrEHz3qMyGYQnsYfPq0XHd65G133OQIguGP4rXOHEG60cC12xCFOICIVpMS9Mfwk+AQS5zwuk1F4YX6gpqHl3Ec4jU6JFatimI7eEKB9q2KBN3AhbqVuf5hopY8S5r+kaU584A+EDa4Ne5MabVRSUWFfx0SdQIGK4U9pzseDE14YC1BWONViu8+Zn//IFrNBqszF7cErEl4NC5H06xDXr4tuJUM5V3mD8aBo21nlTsBZHAflBlX5d5UdCXyEkTaUM2ML/CY7m+HSUdRmlo9mjIJZmzQmdunKdmCwvXgwm1EEpIAsjk4ZcA8HpujvEzbCQ0KSAevbVhkK7y4VlQ==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jjmRx-0000iU-Tl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:22:37 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <93F81C41-E774-4C02-9E9D-5B2CD1F66445@acm.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/12 12:22:38 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252137 Archived-At: --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 05:50:32PM +0200, Mattias Engdeg=C3=A5rd wrote: > 11 juni 2020 kl. 21.22 skrev Yuri Khan : >=20 > > My equipment [...] says that shade of gold in fact > > performs okay in all four scenarios >=20 > I have no reason to doubt your observations. Let's try a plebiscite! >=20 > * * * >=20 > Dear Emacs developer or user, >=20 > Please load the attached code (any Emacs version), and run M-x contrast-c= ompare with various cutoff values on your favourite system, to find what va= lue is best for readability of the colour names (first column). >=20 > Colours with luminance (last column) below the cutoff will be use white t= ext, others black. It is mainly Emacs in graphical (non-TTY) mode that is o= f interest. >=20 > Please reply (to emacs-devel or to me) the following pieces of informatio= n: >=20 > * the cutoff value you found optimal You mean: where the color name is most readable against all backgrounds? 0.375 (although 0.325 gives fine results too) > * system information: window system, screen, anything you think is releva= nt X on Gnu/Linux, thinkpad X230 with the cheaper screen (no IPS) > * whether you use a light or dark background in your Emacs Dark Emacs (but not too dark, #333333-ish) Cheers -- tom=C3=A1s --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAl7jq80ACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZERACfePMDdKH7QTALc6YRIhevUDRp uvEAn3/Hk+k0YfzrogXeMUoS+Ejo3T7z =6QPN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--