From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 15:42:34 +0200 Message-ID: <20200502134234.GA22532@tuxteam.de> References: <831ro2tqqx.fsf@gnu.org> <4a1fd3f4-df92-c756-9874-4d07b54148ac@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FCuugMFkClbJLl1L" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="98965"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 02 15:43:55 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jUsQr-000PeF-TT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 15:43:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42734 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUsQq-0008F8-Vf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 09:43:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUsPg-0003Rp-8Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 09:42:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUsPf-0003pc-Cy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 09:42:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:39752) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUsPe-0003p9-DM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 09:42:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:Date; bh=WDmspoOc1LN+BkFEUDjtSQaa6BmYsyXXQYPuIwdh0+s=; b=tDd2bLAWHFQk3NriXh6USCNfivwoqWyEpUYqy6YhUvke2T9qlF4GX6r4e2lHToCIvdeU64RBi7aT8E1ZZYcbE+VImyB4UvZKyWIegKdsAiQx+hueMjTu5Hmz/HxEX2wMxg1tMFzeYNquD80NSPYGX0znTE0IORnIc90rtiwrg66Yr4z7/pQkiDHOYuZlj32hTDXThb50wKnIYT76KU498NRcTTtbLTap2wUPapY1XaDbdCEeOLGqe05yywi9safiXLbNzkXWoD6fow/54mwHNNy3pd+s1VBlK5TvMnwpkZkKv07vX2/LrViceKesnvGWkS61YPdZr0hoZ3pG8aeBbw==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jUsPa-00067I-U5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 15:42:34 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/02 08:22:29 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 5.199.139.25 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248435 Archived-At: --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 02:34:11PM +0100, Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora wrote: > On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 2:29 PM Dmitry Gutov wrote: > > > > On 02.05.2020 16:23, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > You expect the_name_ to tell you all that?? Then what do you think > > > of C library functions like realpath or stpcpy or strpbrk or rpmatch? > > > > Let's please not use the C library as the example of good naming practi= ce. >=20 > I bet you'll find people that think it has the best naming. I kind of lik= e it. >=20 > My point this: this is all quite subjective. "recent" and "popular" doesn= 't > necessarily equal "good". =2E..or perhaps it is, but it's a different culture, so it's somewhat irrelevant. I'm all for putting thought when developing new interfaces, and correcting obvious mistakes in old ones, but for the latter, one would first have to gather some consensus that it's broken, then on which direction to take, and then on doing the change. That's the art! Cheers -- t --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAl6teMoACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbE3ACff8zD/tYmtd0yABc8kyRU9Lnq InIAn1YsOv6SRUPTg3cw3x5fScktvozT =z7IM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--