From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: transient Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:28:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20200430132812.GD1444@tuxteam.de> References: <87ftcnxu5m.fsf@bernoul.li> <83y2qezlpd.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv12zjx1.fsf@gnu.org> <20200429101755.GF24737@tuxteam.de> <83pnbqzimz.fsf@gnu.org> <20200429105233.GG24737@tuxteam.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BRE3mIcgqKzpedwo" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="106885"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Arthur Miller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 30 15:33:37 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jU9Jk-000RZO-Da for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:33:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60708 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jU9Jj-0006r7-Du for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:33:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jU9G3-0004Oq-6p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:32:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jU9Ed-0002iH-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:29:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:33719) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jU9Ed-0002ht-4l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:28:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=yaBYNds4ZyZQ8UrmA6pUwjiFPuMhli22O0fqPO0h1vo=; b=PDlx9ssZihIPGR7W5Vs4Wvpap6C1nMO2J0fh++10whevhiX2RGCR9NN10z/fP16NW7z0QFc91LLT/1ZKG9AyfLthyJWnEyXFQmVKPasTL7eg2PGdVLEXGvT9sppMo/9m15aEFEOxV79qWuaNRJL2fHYB5Z3ZO9Yn2CsAAqKwfMQXkUw6l2kM6hKsmllT6h4yfw4pMQdHkEAGBk4xrvSI2fe7F9L8svDkMPJDs2bAvwPmgLMul5reL+EDTogFZuj95P/5IlepZ8gQUZW7W3g1s4mpLAET5Zsnfk3/nkChlz3bwk08D215bpeM1yFTdcqGQvmHWFWcQEgUKu3zEYPTTQ==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jU9Ea-0001Az-Ja; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:28:12 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/30 08:38:55 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 5.199.139.25 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248231 Archived-At: --BRE3mIcgqKzpedwo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 02:44:47PM +0200, Arthur Miller wrote: > tomas@tuxteam.de writes: [...] > > I just wanted to raise some awareness, since it's an > > ever-recurring pattern. > > > > Cheers > > -- t > I think you are completely right. API naming in Emacs could use some > more love. "Namespacing" probably can't be used for > everything, but it would be useful if stuff was prefixed by api > where possible [...] If you are replying to my post -- I took care to not take a position on the thing itself: there are already positions which are strong enough. I was arguing for both sides to take care of each other :) Where am I? I'd leave traditional Lisp names where they are. When inventing new names, by all means try to make them regular (which, as we know, is hard /and/ impossible, but trying already helps). Cheers -- t --BRE3mIcgqKzpedwo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAl6q0mwACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaaaACdGoxrxuTFGOLIDUVNMRqnf/qU ZvwAni7rl9CtUfTlKPtzNAhLiOyeIaBf =3ln/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BRE3mIcgqKzpedwo--