From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ? Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:53:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20200427095300.GE30150@tuxteam.de> References: <97DB3D40-872D-4958-83CE-2FB3AB171E7C@zjp.codes> <87v9lmx508.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bi5JUZtvcfApsciF" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="73213"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 27 11:54:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jT0St-000Iwx-IK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:54:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35568 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT0Ss-0004tg-Dz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:54:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT0Rl-0003Qu-7r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:53:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT0Rj-0004Lw-CV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:52434) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jT0Ri-0004LH-GF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:53:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:Date; bh=IevvskehN9DID2c3b6FXCBRBZiE2KzXXFD+ESZsVg1c=; b=TgROKqzUpfdwwI84Ej4pxJu6Y+JT3YaaGzK86GcOlHozzhbAHQwSXIG44D0KNFAs7k2/sm716mVgzKSfsKF4b2DDZW7p3aGUcOLCEB5KGV1PhmlKC0IF0uFZiYc4wyGveedneLnEB3zXXj0Q9hIESN+SIlHIvs68nrsetipHNKHURG8Z5ChcBmIZSFD3aW8xC5WbDNnF49OdplJSiezzyNTCniydSLeWcuvNyKbAfD7G+SOPpBttGufgenXDRiAJQqikoG+2wIqb6aN9Z9G+T+1ZnqYvChvQ5QKvkV1E86Uk3kr36KJfE4N6ZH1RZCffo0VrB8FvGpJLwx2n7Qk34Q==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jT0Rg-000149-4d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:53:00 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/04/27 05:40:45 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 5.199.139.25 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247898 Archived-At: --bi5JUZtvcfApsciF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 09:45:44AM +0000, ndame wrote: > On Sunday, April 26, 2020 6:09 AM, Po Lu wrote: >=20 > > Zach Pearson zach@zjp.codes writes: > > > > > Some people use the buttons in reverse order or otherwise don=E2=80= =99t have mice that conform to the standard that wording would expect. I do= n=E2=80=99t think it takes too much cognitive > > > overhead to map 1/2/3 to left/right/middle for users of those kinds o= f mice. > > > > Actually, 1/2/3 is left/middle/right >=20 >=20 > This exchange also raises the question: is there an advantage > of naming mouse buttons with numbers, instead of using the established > terminology what pretty much all maintream tools use? What is the "established terminology"? Cheers -- t --bi5JUZtvcfApsciF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAl6mq3wACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYl0wCfcEVSAJ35bEltWnkGpgAUffCL CkcAn3qsVS4pQ7ivs3JVgTFkng0X0Vfn =lliJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bi5JUZtvcfApsciF--