From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ergus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about ibuffer Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 04:17:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20191110031743.uy653armkqcawkkg@Ergus> References: <20191110031420.yosogxfr6kgrctwn@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="160947"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: "Rajeev Narang via \"Emacs development discussions.\"" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 10 04:18:43 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTdkQ-000fkR-9g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 04:18:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41052 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTdkO-0001TZ-JC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 22:18:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTdjv-0001TO-Ai for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 22:18:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTdjt-0001lw-RW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 22:18:10 -0500 Original-Received: from sonic306-22.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.189.84]:33129) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTdjt-0001kn-NB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 22:18:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aol.com; s=a2048; t=1573355885; bh=/ZWm0kUhV4wJSMYwDfQf41+WuaphhLYymrgGBLdTcGY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=BOBhhOHk2i2sPp6TuDS+5lizsUuRRt2+ToVF6V7y7gW1y6FGV+UFEFCVxy8NPN+J2m3aNclMDFT/IKVqP5DTgX64VEtKl9USXGPcyTVazfE3Xyhk09IYEJ9H9oNClxRd9lW8u01/HMN7llQ6NefhFi2K3Plwc2oa4NDK3X8Jp+xmlJ+Gydr1iyn0/m0uVI+YNiLsYNbCp1QV2g4NMTm9gggTMT0CXe/71I6FunMQSzk4lYlUET0XEiv8iZKTtarPmBZB84td+1jrXDHKbcikwFWEHkICQnuOwuwGFDCNO1EZq16jhGAdCdU8Jc8T/TXi5QwSvKXJ2gIc5G0F0K7Nlg== X-YMail-OSG: 4f91EGUVM1nCsayldEonHwiUjYmQWF7mnXFzsp88gK3GzWx9WudkiPuLsoZPAR6 fVYNJIR6EhzE4AQuuXp5.bjRruQ4oOLGDxqRQQ47l4.RXPtrtV.yuvyJQo_J0.mjBX60FV3oJYwK OA9kBQVYO5TU2jfwMktS_5VmnvDFfLbiskdJC9kEjpd5dod40pZg80vfAJ6DkSdV2IUgPeSP2XBu 9JA7_BSxFTMMOk0kBG.1BxDdxxhnfBaABtnR2ofUdItDRzQRIham1GZHBJZMYmvj77fode2ooCz4 anvbH_DpCTMyOmWS6.DquJWpFD2zmkam2zbO8wI9rphXOjiDQnurORyEUZVm2bNkaL71C0MeV97F nxWUcC_rIZOYe4dLYoA0JSUbN_NTultvq08kcWwhlaygjqztHlnqnME36jjXyKIY13PrpnRw5MS1 2zTB55G2gOJf8y5iyB1slf9JUqlSlP6PAS8yQdDevWmrVFscCT1Q_aTBmoAc8zjJuMcpriBcAeRH WShupuIQbcmsUecfkRrTgOeT92i5r6DLEhzG_RZDL_qS3FJe18.jiVWNrowS1KNxfzHNpDNi2eCF jKAWpFbhwKCAbLEcPzjO7M4wmJ9VMXlX7rE6Xczah.C78aXN69sB8HszZcNmx0LCbEaVNOBXxCW7 KA5fGezqQvxdnsyrph4ws23RpGKWKI6BtuGvkL7e0L65ruWGKKvvwo4nUjHgI2ogK5EcBEQH.aV3 TWPp7tSd6Wikc.HRbwAGUe00GKw4.88QddAE9b.8VydMaxTkTynuvWh2sfqU2FvV.0q9aEJuNx5t t0whaKDJrswu0LIShrSJO5bc910AluGG4qQXj6LcB9 Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic306.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 03:18:05 +0000 Original-Received: by smtp426.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 7c57523b471ffd64580d947a3034cb35; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 03:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191110031420.yosogxfr6kgrctwn@Ergus> X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.14680 hermes Apache-HttpAsyncClient/4.1.4 (Java/1.8.0_181) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.163.189.84 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242064 Archived-At: On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 04:14:22AM +0100, Ergus wrote: >Hi: > >I am not proposing anything just making a question: > >Why, if we have imenu (which looks better than the list-buffers), it is >not the default for C-x C-b? > >I know it is just a line in the config, but for example when loading >with emacs -Q will be available by default and have a most modern view. > >Is it a reason for that or just the typical disagree about defaults? Sorry I mean ibuffer my bad.