From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 7cfe2dc: In edebug in GUIs, move focus to the selected frame. Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:21:32 +0000 Message-ID: <20181019192132.GB6639@ACM> References: <20181019175416.10874.88992@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20181019175418.27D6920407@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20181019184916.GA6639@ACM> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1539977326 27852 195.159.176.226 (19 Oct 2018 19:28:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:28:46 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 19 21:28:41 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDaRt-00078E-Be for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:28:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52369 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDaTz-0005oO-Ff for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:30:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDaT8-0005nB-D2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:29:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDaT5-0001Fj-6T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:29:58 -0400 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:61550 helo=mail.muc.de) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDaT4-0001EB-S6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:29:55 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 83118 invoked by uid 3782); 19 Oct 2018 19:29:53 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p5B147207.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.20.114.7]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:29:52 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 5956 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Oct 2018 19:21:32 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 9.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 193.149.48.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230507 Archived-At: Hello, Stefan. On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 15:07:42 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > I thought about that, but in the end decided that could be a bit heavy > > for when information is only being displayed, i.e. in > > edebug-trace-display. > If the intention is only to display the code shouldn't use pop-to-buffer > but display-buffer. The doc string of display-buffer is a bit of a heavy read at this time of night. ;-) > > This bit of the code surely originates from the time before frames were > > implemented. > [ Probably, but since most Emacs users don't actually make use of multiple > frames, a lot of code written much more recently also suffers from the > same kinds of "outdated" assumptions. ] Most Emacs users restrict themselves to just one frame? Ouch! I couldn't work like that! > Stefan -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).