From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Werner LEMBERG Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2018 06:39:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <20180806.063922.901083783893209465.wl@gnu.org> References: <39939ea5-a7c2-400a-9ac1-4df7cf4fcb42@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533530274 29645 195.159.176.226 (6 Aug 2018 04:37:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 04:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: hmelman@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 06 06:37:49 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fmXH2-0007OX-Ig for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 06:37:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60640 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmXJ4-0002n2-Ia for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:39:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33259) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmXIt-0002mm-Sa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:39:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmXIp-0006eS-1w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:39:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:34431) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fmXIo-0006dt-N4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:39:30 -0400 Original-Received: from gnu.org ([217.149.171.28]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mh9cj-1fYycg2iuX-00MIlW; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 06:39:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.0.50 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:KZOoAEuBTgcNxgBCKz14uxDhMb2d5qbaxVdrBr/oQ7oDoBKkHpJ 658d0G6hfgKmz/6FK7j2ZRsd7ND7OX+xDVzlbWsXvR0fUzQRbJs0AAQFFMrbcGh0CHKgBX+ rdafRHclCEqri+PejdWj9HbAaySKd6GhxuZx1MIRsjgYVrKG2bHS8hWXPp/KBbIGznFp3ca 5HOJxNkIfR2w4CHXo0bzQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:fJTDH8SUmRM=:bQK/fWr/h9+KostBJvdxhZ 9R7acr8QRlbf0OmdK3vmypWuBkQbT1mCe+WAPUVwE7/SyOo+OPj8SjYHkJ6RR1Vs+CKulKZHn Bn0+ItroYiUjuR6rUXZ4ZKfcHZvkgxi9qKE1BUlILf+qQUgzpcl5lJ0ZcV9YFXa2M7+oqFu5U FkaWyDAzTDuBexu/qal2sMks4hGspmXrkK0iI8A2KxiTyxZ1La0xacFs4uI4+tTelA8E+C1ro Se05nRXsFVy8lAMTIwuw/aQGvhgj5lOuEX/TkThWAQKh1Y4q+4ENSG/AVyLehkrmufHs0TzR2 8DRcEzAZh16K5s+1YT4h4fE8U/UMBufMUZSSfYtR2UPPHprmS15H5IXu35M1AaBUsWgDITIyP kQ+g2lXA4FzAU1K2/7+maa5Kz4T6eBLrVX0594GesugolvXBLLU97iZ0BbBa00af2IVMjy9Ox kqMtWZ0/fg1hV2dvYWa+KcXX8IJ4jSs5sZ3I8L1n+PyuJo1KCcuHgu3xdNSrmcUDJVtYxm7YQ Od4X8Vq3Faf9bxFbXOQVDZm4f7nmc6wWMeTN/rLJkZixPMjDFHq9y5mIYp6VO4fP7vdVPF9G4 GsaVwzFy2Ht46x8Jcys34tmlHrfCyW6leDLPInrMSEhtwvYwp2uprlE8ffnMeXxxvaF61RGCV qzRD9fyaeAcsp1flPr4WbnIoEHuDIsUgk2y8PJhC8I6DtYY44msBdMXDjpd13YihNp+FFHNNL 8zsAxprpQSY4AeKWiRnzM4dAOYz9b0M16ulNGbfxesDFi6esUSouB+cjQiHoIJosajJ/RoD6 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228206 Archived-At: > My sense is that the proposed C-x & is a prefix, because it is used before > another key sequence. It is not an argument because it doesn't affect the > functions' argument list the way C-u does. > > Maybe the term should be "prefix sequence"? What about `multiplexer command', avoiding the perhaps misleading `prefix' word altogether? Werner