unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza@udel.edu>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: pure-fns in byte-opt.el
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 12:34:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170729163446.GA9109@holos.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83vamb3duz.fsf@gnu.org>

On 29/07/17 at 10:24am, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 21:24:07 -0400
>> From: Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza@udel.edu>
>> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>>
>> >> #3  0x000000000060f09b in Ffuncall (nargs=4, args=0x7fffffffb688) at eval.c:2742
>> >>         fun = XIL(0x17aee65)
>> >>         original_fun = XIL(0x20b0da0)
>> >>         funcar = XIL(0xce8cc0)
>> >>         numargs = 3
>> >>         val = make_number(897379714801469509)
>> >>         count = 58
>> >
>> >In this frame #3, what are the values of the important variables?
>> >
>> >  (gdb) frame 3
>> >  (gdb) pp original_fun
>>
>> unidata-gen-table-word-list
>>
>> >  (gdb) pp args[1]
>> >  (gdb) pp args[2]
>> >  (gdb) pp args[3]
>>
>> decomposition
>> 5
>> unidata-split-decomposition
>>
>> >  (gdb) pp funcar
>> >  (gdb) pp fun
>>
>> #<INVALID_LISP_OBJECT 0x00ce8cc0>
>
>Thanks.
>
>So I think the problem happens in unidata-word-list-compress, and it
>happens because make-vector, which that function calls always returns
>the same vector, so the vectors used by that function and created by
>it are all messed up.

I don't follow: why does it always return the same vector?  That
particular call to make-vector should be unaffected by make-vector being
marked pure, because its arguments aren't constants.  OTOH, the form
(make-vector 128 nil) would indeed get byte-compiled into the constant
[nil nil … nil]



  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-29 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-25  2:06 pure-fns in byte-opt.el Mark Oteiza
2017-07-25  8:14 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-07-25 14:16   ` Stefan Monnier
2017-07-25 20:57     ` Philipp Stephani
2017-07-25 21:27       ` Stefan Monnier
2017-07-25 22:28         ` Clément Pit-Claudel
2017-07-26  0:08           ` Stefan Monnier
2017-07-26  7:39             ` Clément Pit-Claudel
2017-07-26 12:58               ` Stefan Monnier
2017-07-28 17:45         ` Philipp Stephani
2017-07-28 17:49           ` Stefan Monnier
2017-07-28 17:52             ` Philipp Stephani
2017-07-28 22:20               ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-24  7:31                 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-09-24 16:23                   ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-25 22:06                     ` Richard Stallman
2017-09-26  0:25                       ` Stefan Monnier
2020-07-25 19:53                         ` Philipp Stephani
2020-07-25 19:58                           ` Stefan Monnier
2020-07-25 20:08                             ` Philipp Stephani
2020-07-25 20:59                               ` Stefan Monnier
2020-07-29 14:21                                 ` Philipp Stephani
2020-07-29 14:25                                   ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-24 16:26                   ` Drew Adams
2017-07-26  1:00   ` Mark Oteiza
2017-07-26 14:33     ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-27  2:36       ` Mark Oteiza
2017-07-27  2:46         ` Stefan Monnier
2017-07-29 16:43           ` Mark Oteiza
2017-07-29 17:22             ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-29 19:48               ` Mark Oteiza
2017-07-29 20:03                 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-07-29 20:14                   ` Mark Oteiza
2017-07-27 17:06         ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-28  0:24           ` Mark Oteiza
2017-07-28  7:02             ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-29  1:24               ` Mark Oteiza
2017-07-29  7:24                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-07-29 16:34                   ` Mark Oteiza [this message]
2017-07-29 17:21                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-09-24  7:34                       ` Philipp Stephani
2017-09-24 16:24                         ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-24 23:22                         ` John Wiegley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170729163446.GA9109@holos.localdomain \
    --to=mvoteiza@udel.edu \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).