From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Perry E. Metzger" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Option name conventions (was Re: scroll-down with pixel transition) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:24:07 -0400 Message-ID: <20170421102407.0c34d07d@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> References: <693E1D44-797B-4B0D-9D0B-6FEB6DF32531@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> <83lgqze7mq.fsf@gnu.org> <20170419.212155.180931830.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> <83a87ccv8s.fsf@gnu.org> <834lxkcssf.fsf@gnu.org> <834lxib7jy.fsf@gnu.org> <20170421092152.733ce76c@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83k26danlz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1492784666 16069 195.159.176.226 (21 Apr 2017 14:24:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:24:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 21 16:24:18 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZTt-0003sI-QO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:24:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59915 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZTw-0007Ji-At for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:24:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZTo-0007Jc-Rx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:24:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZTo-0004UM-02 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:24:12 -0400 Original-Received: from hacklheber.piermont.com ([166.84.7.14]:50025) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d1ZTk-0004Tt-9b; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:24:08 -0400 Original-Received: from snark.cb.piermont.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hacklheber.piermont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97AD41E4; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:24:07 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from jabberwock.cb.piermont.com (jabberwock.cb.piermont.com [10.160.2.107]) by snark.cb.piermont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613022DE040; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:24:07 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83k26danlz.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 166.84.7.14 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214190 Archived-At: On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 16:36:56 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > Our convention is to end user option names in '-flag', when > > > > they are for users to set. Let's document that, if it isn't > > > > already. > > > > > > It is not currently documented in code conventions. > > > > > > > If this really is the convention, I should change the option name > > I'm about to add (related to column number display.) > > I see no reason to do that at this time, not until we agree that > this is the convention and document it as such. Cool. Please do let people know if that changes. Perry -- Perry E. Metzger perry@piermont.com