unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
To: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk
Subject: Re: Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64?
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:49:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161107134942.0e418fa4@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1c3l8t-0007ih-Og@fencepost.gnu.org>

On Mon, 07 Nov 2016 09:43:23 -0500 Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
wrote:
> Given that Windows is so widely used, and that so many users stick
> to old versions of it, it is plausible to me that millions of people
> still use Windows 98.  Maybe tens or hundreds of millions.

It is not likely. There is statistical information that was
cited earlier in this thread. Windows 9x and ME are now below 0.01%
usage. How much below is hard to measure.

Emacs was likely never particularly popular with people willing to
hold on to an OS for that long either, as such people are typically
not technical users (and in fact, the users of those systems are in
fact typically not people at all in the sense that such systems,
when they remain, are embedded systems doing things like balancing
car wheels and running old cash registers).

So, given a fraction of a percent userbase and a fraction of a
percent for that OS, I think it would be fairly safe to assume we're
talking about a fraction of a percent of a fraction of a percent,
probably too small to measure.

Such people also are unlikely to have very good ability to
use the internet because their machines would be taken over by
malware within seconds of attaching to an open network, and because
no web browsers exist for such platforms capable of using modern web
sites. I would guess, therefore, that they're unlikely to be
downloading new copies of Emacs as they arise.

There is nothing, IMHO, wrong with telling such users that they will
have to use Emacs 25.1 and before and documenting that. I would be
quite sincerely surprised, however, if anyone at all was
inconvenienced.

> That number may still be growing.  ISTR that even a few years ago
> people were still installing unauthorized copies of Windows 98 on
> PCs, because Microsoft made it harder to install subsequent Windows
> versions.

That has not been true in a long time. As noted, the statistics do not
bear this out, and in fact, it is not hard to install a more recent
version of Windows even without Microsoft permission. If you're in a
country like China you can get your hands on unlocked much more recent
versions of Windows without paying for it.

Indeed, the situation is such that Microsoft more or less made it
possible to install Windows 10 without any license key. The only real
effect of this is that you get a watermark in one corner of the
screen telling you that you should register your copy.

> It would not surprise me if Windows 98 was installed on
> millions of new PCs this year.

I will bet you this is not the case.

Perry
-- 
Perry E. Metzger		perry@piermont.com



  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-07 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <6e2cffe5-942b-48d4-9ed5-ef39803bcd30@googlegroups.com>
     [not found] ` <b361e3a3-849e-486a-b758-64316c0efea5@googlegroups.com>
     [not found]   ` <87mvhgsf21.fsf@russet.org.uk>
     [not found]     ` <8360o4monq.fsf@gnu.org>
     [not found]       ` <87vaw4gq0j.fsf@russet.org.uk>
     [not found]         ` <83oa1vlnkk.fsf@gnu.org>
     [not found]           ` <87d1iba6od.fsf@russet.org.uk>
2016-11-05  8:16             ` Windows emacs-25.1 i686 vs x86_64? Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-05 22:26               ` Phillip Lord
2016-11-06  3:43                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-06  8:10                   ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-06 15:48                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-06 16:13                       ` Óscar Fuentes
2016-11-06 16:43                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-06 17:01                           ` Óscar Fuentes
2016-11-06 17:24                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-06 18:26                               ` Óscar Fuentes
2016-11-06 18:42                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-06 19:17                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-06 20:15                                   ` Óscar Fuentes
2016-11-07 14:40                             ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-07 15:16                               ` Phillip Lord
2016-11-08 13:53                                 ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-06 16:51                       ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-06 18:50                       ` John Wiegley
2016-11-07 14:42                         ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-06 21:54                       ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-06 21:57                         ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-07 14:43                         ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-07 15:15                           ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-07 15:26                           ` Phillip Lord
2016-11-08 13:53                             ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-08 14:52                               ` Phillip Lord
2016-11-08 15:31                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-09 16:50                                   ` Phillip Lord
2016-11-09 17:15                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-09 17:18                                     ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-10 15:19                                       ` Phillip Lord
2016-11-09  7:00                                 ` martin rudalics
2016-11-15 10:26                                 ` Phillip Lord
2016-11-07 16:34                           ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-07 18:07                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-07 19:02                               ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-07 19:29                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-07 21:54                                   ` Phillip Lord
2016-11-07 19:39                                 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-07 20:02                                   ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-07 20:10                                     ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-07 20:22                                       ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-07 20:27                                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-08  3:48                                           ` Elias Mårtenson
2016-11-08 15:32                                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-07 18:49                           ` Perry E. Metzger [this message]
2016-11-08 13:55                             ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-08 14:34                               ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-06 21:50                   ` Phillip Lord
2016-11-06  4:13                 ` Noam Postavsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161107134942.0e418fa4@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com \
    --to=perry@piermont.com \
    --cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=phillip.lord@russet.org.uk \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).