From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Perry E. Metzger" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we go GTK-only? Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 23:29:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20161102232934.209f7024@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> References: <24db2975-17ca-ad01-20c8-df12071fa89a@dancol.org> <4615E73A-19E2-4B79-9889-D3FA686DDDE6@raeburn.org> <83bmy0pl8p.fsf@gnu.org> <831sywp7ew.fsf@gnu.org> <83y413nsjm.fsf@gnu.org> <83funbnngl.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1ifnmto.fsf@gnu.org> <20161101152027.5e94b6cc@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83ziljm0ei.fsf@gnu.org> <83ins5nai2.fsf@gnu.org> <83eg2tmyhy.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478143819 5873 195.159.176.226 (3 Nov 2016 03:30:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 03:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dancol@dancol.org, raeburn@raeburn.org, Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 03 04:30:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c28j2-0007vP-W9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 04:30:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58719 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c28j5-00067S-NK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 23:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36557) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c28iy-00065m-8Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 23:29:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c28iv-0000lD-6I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 23:29:56 -0400 Original-Received: from hacklheber.piermont.com ([2001:470:30:84:e276:63ff:fe62:3400]:40661) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c28id-0000aa-Np; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 23:29:35 -0400 Original-Received: from snark.cb.piermont.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hacklheber.piermont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC481F5; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 23:29:34 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from jabberwock.cb.piermont.com (jabberwock.cb.piermont.com [10.160.2.107]) by snark.cb.piermont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2A12DE021; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 23:29:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83eg2tmyhy.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:470:30:84:e276:63ff:fe62:3400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209132 Archived-At: On Wed, 02 Nov 2016 22:13:13 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Stefan Monnier > > Cc: perry@piermont.com, dancol@dancol.org, > > raeburn@raeburn.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 > > 12:04:48 -0400 > > > "Should", not "will". And on some systems, only with very > > > recent library versions. > > > > Again: which system are you think of that's had a buggy > > malloc-with-threads in the last, say, ten years? > > Even glibc had a bug. And one or 2 of *BSDs. > Which BSD? Name. Date. And yes, glibc had a bug in free. It caused a memory leak, not a crash, and it was fixed. -- Perry E. Metzger perry@piermont.com