From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>,
emacs-devel@gnu.org, raeburn@raeburn.org,
monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: Can we go GTK-only?
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:54:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161031135438.317114a2@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8360o8pisk.fsf@gnu.org>
On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:47:23 +0200 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, raeburn@raeburn.org,
> > emacs-devel@gnu.org From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
> > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 08:59:11 -0700
> >
> > Of course there's no direct access to glyph matrices, but you can
> > imagine a scheme where both of the two parts above each have an
> > idea of what desired layout should be.
>
> That's exactly the part that needs to be carefully designed. It is
> nowhere near what we have now, because the current expression of
> "the idea of what the desired layout should be" is the glyph
> matrices, which in their present shape cannot be shared by several
> processes.
>
> I'm not even sure we could come up with a useful scheme that would
> allow such a division in a way that will let the communications
> between the two work efficiently. It remains to be shown that this
> is feasible.
So there would seem to be two obvious ways to keep the two
matrices in sync. One would be to record all the changes made on the
one side as they are made and serialize that. The other way would be
to use a dynamic programming algorithm to find the minimum set of
differences and transmit them. Given that redisplay is likely nearly
continuous, I'd say the former makes more sense.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger perry@piermont.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-31 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-27 19:54 Can we go GTK-only? Daniel Colascione
2016-10-27 20:05 ` Frank Haun
2016-10-27 20:45 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-10-27 21:08 ` Frank Haun
2016-10-27 20:32 ` Paul Eggert
2016-10-27 23:15 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-10-28 7:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-28 2:35 ` Richard Stallman
2016-10-28 6:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-28 7:27 ` Ulrich Mueller
2016-10-28 8:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-28 10:48 ` Frank Haun
2016-10-28 12:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-28 13:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-10-30 14:43 ` Ken Raeburn
2016-10-30 21:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-10-30 22:49 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-10-30 23:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-10-31 3:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 15:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 0:00 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2016-10-31 8:24 ` Ken Raeburn
2016-10-31 16:34 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 8:22 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2016-10-31 3:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 15:57 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-10-31 15:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 15:59 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-10-31 16:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 17:54 ` Perry E. Metzger [this message]
2016-10-31 20:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 15:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 15:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 18:22 ` Ken Raeburn
2016-10-31 20:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 21:04 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 15:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 16:28 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-01 16:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 16:54 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 17:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:16 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 19:15 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 19:28 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2016-11-01 19:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 16:55 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-01 17:15 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 16:41 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 16:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:22 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 17:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:56 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 19:35 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 16:45 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 17:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:06 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 17:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:18 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 17:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:45 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 19:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-01 19:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 19:42 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 19:20 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 20:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 20:17 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 20:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-02 2:26 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-02 15:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-02 15:55 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-02 5:00 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2016-11-02 15:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-03 3:43 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2016-11-03 17:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-02 0:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-02 15:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-02 16:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-02 19:25 ` Nikolaus Rath
2016-11-02 19:25 ` Nikolaus Rath
2016-11-02 20:33 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-03 1:25 ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-02 20:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-03 3:29 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-03 18:07 ` John Wiegley
2016-11-03 22:07 ` John Wiegley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161031135438.317114a2@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com \
--to=perry@piermont.com \
--cc=dancol@dancol.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=raeburn@raeburn.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).