From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Disappearance of hi-lock bindings from global key map. Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:36:35 +0000 Message-ID: <20160205113635.GB7727@acm.fritz.box> References: <20160205103744.GA7727@acm.fritz.box> <83bn7vv1zi.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454672079 31911 80.91.229.3 (5 Feb 2016 11:34:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 11:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 05 12:34:30 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aReek-00044T-3p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:34:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47678 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aReeg-0007lE-48 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:34:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aReeb-0007j3-Ji for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:34:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aReeX-00035G-R0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:34:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.muc.de ([193.149.48.3]:39058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aReeX-00034K-HX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:34:17 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 45176 invoked by uid 3782); 5 Feb 2016 11:34:15 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p548A4CF8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.138.76.248]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:34:14 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 8479 invoked by uid 1000); 5 Feb 2016 11:36:35 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83bn7vv1zi.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 9.x X-Received-From: 193.149.48.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199376 Archived-At: Hello, Eli. On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 01:19:13PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 10:37:44 +0000 > > From: Alan Mackenzie > > > > The traditional key bindings for hi-lock commands, beginning C-x w, have > > disappeared from the 25.1 global key map. They have been replaced by > > bindings beginning M-s h. > That's not what I see here: when I turn on hi-lock-mode, the "C-x w" > bindings are shown in the output of "C-h b". > What exactly do you see that led you to the above conclusion? emacs -Q C-x w (intending C-x w C-h) responds "C-x w is undefined". On the other hand, M-s h C-h displays the bindings in *Help*. That led me to believe the C-x h bindings had been removed. It would appear there's a difference between how the C-x w bindings are set and how the M-s h bindings are set. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).