From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Zack Piper Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: About the differences among the versions of emacs obtained by different git commands. Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 09:49:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20150906074944.GA2037@apertron.net> References: <87mvx0c83u.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1441525803 25705 80.91.229.3 (6 Sep 2015 07:50:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 07:50:03 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 06 09:49:55 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYUi2-0006iB-7y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2015 09:49:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45993 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYUi1-0006x5-7L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2015 03:49:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYUhy-0006wb-4H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2015 03:49:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYUhu-0005ur-Ta for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2015 03:49:50 -0400 Original-Received: from apertron.net ([94.23.236.101]:48562) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZYUhu-0005ud-NG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Sep 2015 03:49:46 -0400 Original-Received: by apertron.net (Postfix, from userid 30061) id 0352260022; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 09:49:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=apertron.net; s=mail; t=1441525786; bh=xLC7oJfVqAMaPWc7P2+1ufwsYC1EAfVaziY53N7NauY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ZoArSTJ4v7ml0M3kYRiWi6LtraWBRzp7f67DxUixXSJFBeIUsqFn+1WoFSpu776fY pxN+TGT7RkQycG6wqRFC66VrYwWSM5QIip+8blDX5CMYxBEzreGtKs+CZodZE8ahYe +ijt7DETMrkliCEMGkpzvxIWUKPXvjUv7Wp4eCvI= Original-Received: from apertron.net (apertron.net [94.23.236.101]) by apertron.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C76155FF95 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 09:49:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=apertron.net; s=mail; t=1441525785; bh=xLC7oJfVqAMaPWc7P2+1ufwsYC1EAfVaziY53N7NauY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=rnV2aIaZbcXT5hGtPaByAjskUsOZvoykA2efcFFQcK0UNFBVWX7oVKzp7LZj551EJ ygLkkQ+KCjJz0mX/B3hplPaB3XLpm5EnSOGOLTvBw2Z0fy2dQPg8gNM0fbv9D9ohCv Au5zHlpeyck8iZA0UaEGsMhU8WQBYRVnhO2clkaA= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mvx0c83u.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23+113 (34ca1c5fdd45) (2014-03-12) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 94.23.236.101 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:189647 Archived-At: Hongyi Zhao writes: > Again, are the following two commands equivalent or not: > > git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/emacs/elpa > git clone git://git.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/elpa.git `git.sv.gnu.org' and `git.savannah.gnu.org' are the same thing, according to `dig': $ diff =(dig git.sv.gnu.org) =(dig git.savannah.gnu.org) # zsh output-to-file syntax (`=') used if you're curious. 2c2 < ; <<>> DiG 9.9.6-P1 <<>> git.sv.gnu.org --- > ; <<>> DiG 9.9.6-P1 <<>> git.savannah.gnu.org 5c5 < ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 13244 --- > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 45385 11c11 < ;git.sv.gnu.org. IN A --- > ;git.savannah.gnu.org. IN A 14c14 < git.sv.gnu.org. 119 IN A 208.118.235.72 --- > git.savannah.gnu.org. 285 IN A 208.118.235.72 17d16 < gnu.org. 41581 IN NS ns2.gnu.org. 19a19 > gnu.org. 41581 IN NS ns2.gnu.org. 31c31 < ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 217 --- > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 223 Which indicates that the IP addresses are the same. `sv.gnu.org' is (probably) only used as a shorthand for `savannah.gnu.org' literally only for convenience. If there is in fact a different I'd be very interested to here about it. For more proof I cloned both repositories and measured the directory sizes: $ du -s savannah.gnu.org sv.gnu 72116 savannah.gnu.org 72120 sv.gnu Where the host name of where I cloned it from (which is stored in `.git.config') is probably the only thing making a difference. -- Zack Piper http://apertron.net