From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 24.5 second release candidate Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 11:51:42 +0000 Message-ID: <20150403115142.GB2867@acm.fritz.box> References: <87619fvb9s.fsf@blueberry.home> <87384juhme.fsf@blueberry.home> <87zj6qtzch.fsf@blueberry.home> <20150402140228.GB23848@acm.fritz.box> <838uear1xa.fsf@gnu.org> <20150402161256.GC23848@acm.fritz.box> <834moyqwb9.fsf@gnu.org> <20150403110615.GA2867@acm.fritz.box> <83pp7lphza.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1428061934 18563 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2015 11:52:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 11:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, nicolas@petton.fr, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 03 13:52:07 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ye08r-0003cA-Km for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 13:52:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33722 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ye08r-0006ae-4y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:52:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34739) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ye08k-0006W3-SI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ye08g-0007IY-2i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:51:58 -0400 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:56183 helo=mail.muc.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ye08f-0007HP-PD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 07:51:54 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 19600 invoked by uid 3782); 3 Apr 2015 11:51:52 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (pD951A882.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.81.168.130]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 13:51:50 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 3398 invoked by uid 1000); 3 Apr 2015 11:51:42 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83pp7lphza.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 9.x X-Received-From: 193.149.48.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184832 Archived-At: Hello again, Eli. On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 02:30:01PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 11:06:15 +0000 > > Cc: rgm@gnu.org, nicolas@petton.fr, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > From: Alan Mackenzie > > I don't want to try to fix this in a few hours; a few days would be > > more realistic. > How about simply reverting d69e9f1c24f37f36af33b0468c5a4e100dbb09b6? > I'd like to avoid holding 24.5, unless reverting that commit would > result in some very bad behavior in frequent use cases. I think this would be for the best. It's just the bug it "fixed" will remain apparent. Could you perhaps give me a tip as to how best to revert a commit with git? > We can always roll out 24.6 soon, if reverting that commit turns out > to be a bad call. I'll have a quick check on subsequent commits - hey, there aren't any! I don't think reverting this will have any ill effects. > WDYT? We should revert d69e... -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).