From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ineiev Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.texinfo.bugs,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: texi2html output validity Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 08:58:00 -0500 Message-ID: <20141225135800.GA16721@gnu.org> References: <87y4q1fekv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87k31kga2y.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87r3vsdps7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87a92ehctk.fsf_-_@violet.siamics.net> <20141223164911.GD5623@free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1419515893 1580 80.91.229.3 (25 Dec 2014 13:58:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 13:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-texinfo@gnu.org, Emacs developers To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: bug-texinfo-bounces+gnu-bug-texinfo2=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 25 14:58:07 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gnu-bug-texinfo2@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y48vU-0001Cl-Tj for gnu-bug-texinfo2@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 14:58:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50967 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y48vT-0004rB-NG for gnu-bug-texinfo2@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 08:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47671) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y48vR-0004qt-EN for bug-texinfo@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 08:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y48vQ-0005pQ-OF for bug-texinfo@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 08:58:01 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35318) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y48vQ-0005pM-Kn; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 08:58:00 -0500 Original-Received: from ineiev by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y48vQ-0006ee-Ce; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 08:58:00 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: bug-texinfo@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for the GNU Texinfo documentation system List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-texinfo-bounces+gnu-bug-texinfo2=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-texinfo-bounces+gnu-bug-texinfo2=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.texinfo.bugs:7001 gmane.emacs.devel:180654 Archived-At: Hello, On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:59:32AM +0700, Yuri Khan wrote: > > What browsers are there that do not support CSS *and* at the same time > have the capability of displaying proportional fonts? They may not be able to exactly display proportional fonts, but they may highlight it in a different way (e.g. HTML reader could modify the voice or, in a verbose mode, just say it's tt). Yes, CSS support is much more problematic (the stylesheet isn't likely to apply to the medium in the first place).