From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eric S. Raymond" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing rollback from VC mode - request for comment Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 05:04:48 -0500 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs Message-ID: <20141214100448.GA15515@thyrsus.com> References: <20141211092138.6D5F6C008E@snark.thyrsus.com> <20141211183649.GE581@thyrsus.com> <20141212174501.GB26351@thyrsus.com> <20141213134155.GE2092@thyrsus.com> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418551559 10439 80.91.229.3 (14 Dec 2014 10:05:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 10:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esr@snark.thyrsus.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 14 11:05:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y063j-0001tb-Og for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 11:05:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35490 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y063j-0003Cn-8Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 05:05:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37709) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y063H-0003Bi-Kk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 05:05:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y063D-0001Su-Cg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 05:05:23 -0500 Original-Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:60448 helo=snark.thyrsus.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y063D-0001Sq-8b; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 05:05:19 -0500 Original-Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C4C66C0085; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 05:04:48 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 71.162.243.5 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:180062 Archived-At: Richard Stallman : > > It was followed by co -u. So either it never worked the way all three > > of us think it should, or it did at one time but someone "corrected" it > > to leave the master and workfile in what they thought was a more coherent > > state. The latter seems not unlikely. > > What does the change log say about this function? Looking...nothing indicative. -- Eric S. Raymond