From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eric S. Raymond" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More metaproblem Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 06:07:42 -0500 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs Message-ID: <20141204110742.GA32524@thyrsus.com> References: <547F6774.50700@cs.ucla.edu> <838uio5vjw.fsf@gnu.org> <20141203211447.GB15111@thyrsus.com> <871toge5zw.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> <83388v6hsq.fsf@gnu.org> <85egsfpytd.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83sigv4ttc.fsf@gnu.org> <20141204102742.GA31661@thyrsus.com> <871tofvh2g.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83oarj4r2l.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417691303 19515 80.91.229.3 (4 Dec 2014 11:08:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Kastrup , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 04 12:08:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XwUGf-00038S-Qu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 12:08:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45320 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwUGf-0008WL-Bl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:08:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43495) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwUGM-0008WB-Dp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwUGI-0001y1-69 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:07:58 -0500 Original-Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:38586 helo=snark.thyrsus.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwUG7-0001vd-EU; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:07:43 -0500 Original-Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F1A7038343D; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 06:07:42 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83oarj4r2l.fsf@gnu.org> X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 71.162.243.5 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:178819 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii : > > From: David Kastrup > > Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:35:03 +0100 > > > > >> Maybe we should simply move all that into etc/CONTRIBUTE, and leave in > > >> admin/notes only stuff that is minor/obscure etc. > > > > > > I agree, and was intending to suggest that myself. > > > > admin/notes should only contain stuff relevant for people with push > > access. Preparing a patch does not entail that. > > We can have a section there labeled "if you have write access to the > repository". I see nothing wrong with that, and no need to have yet > another file with possibly contradictory instructions. +1 -- Eric S. Raymond