From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Perry E. Metzger" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug#766395: emacs/gnus: Uses s_client to for SSL. Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:19:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20141029071924.3ad7c840@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> References: <20141022193441.GA11872@roeckx.be> <87mw8mzmxj.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20141023143702.3897e618@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <8761fazkx7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20141023145721.12ed0820@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87vbnay5lf.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20141023154223.45f2c9eb@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <874muuihjh.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20141023230048.13f8234a@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87wq7pgpif.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20141024171421.78720abe@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87r3xxgmx2.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20141024204202.276dbb1f@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <8738a95t6b.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20141027153954.08930677@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87lho04qvn.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20141028111032.19366491@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87a94f4naw.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20141028230614.52b4f9a0@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <871tpr49mt.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1414581598 28925 80.91.229.3 (29 Oct 2014 11:19:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Florian Weimer , emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, Rob Browning , kurt@roeckx.be To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 29 12:19:48 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XjRHz-000750-Ng for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:19:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45061 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XjRHz-0000n0-1C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:19:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58276) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XjRHi-0000mt-Fe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:19:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XjRHh-0003Mi-Dw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:19:26 -0400 Original-Received: from hacklheber.piermont.com ([2001:470:30:84:e276:63ff:fe62:3400]:35650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XjRHh-0003Mb-AI; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:19:25 -0400 Original-Received: from snark.cb.piermont.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hacklheber.piermont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAE8166; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:19:24 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from jabberwock.cb.piermont.com (jabberwock.cb.piermont.com [10.160.2.107]) by snark.cb.piermont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C922DE1AE; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:19:24 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871tpr49mt.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 2001:470:30:84:e276:63ff:fe62:3400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175973 Archived-At: On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:28:58 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote: > Perry E. Metzger writes: > > > > N.B. As you have probably recognized, the above is argument ad > > > hominem, > > > > Yes, and thus it is not valid argumentation. > > Look who's arguing by label now! Whatever. When you want to have a discussion which doesn't consist of insults, ad hominems, strawmen and all the rest, your points might then be of some value. Regardless, the current form of this discussion is long since of no interest to the Emacs developers list. Perry -- Perry E. Metzger perry@piermont.com