From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eric S. Raymond" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Lisp's future Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 06:27:37 -0400 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs Message-ID: <20140919102737.GA1081@thyrsus.com> References: <87wq97i78i.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <87sijqxzr2.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> <877g11c8wh.fsf@gmx.us> <87wq91uhe8.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> <87k3508oie.fsf@gmx.us> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1411122521 29416 80.91.229.3 (19 Sep 2014 10:28:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:28:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jonas@bernoul.li, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Rasmus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 19 12:28:35 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XUvQZ-0004N4-3A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:28:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57311 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUvQY-0006cq-No for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 06:28:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUvQI-0006cW-P4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 06:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUvQD-00027w-Ga for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 06:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:59216 helo=snark.thyrsus.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XUvQD-00027H-DF; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 06:28:13 -0400 Original-Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BC6D73803B9; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 06:27:37 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k3508oie.fsf@gmx.us> X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 71.162.243.5 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:174541 Archived-At: Rasmus : > > Why is it preferable to using VC? > > A while ago VC was not good for git. I think I remember having issues > with committing several files in one commit and with branches way back > with VC. I fixed the multi-file commit issue in 2006. If there is still some issue with brances, please explain so I can fix it. -- Eric S. Raymond