From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eric S. Raymond" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Git transition workflow Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:58:30 -0400 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs Message-ID: <20140812025830.GA15317@thyrsus.com> References: <87r40migqm.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1407812362 26793 80.91.229.3 (12 Aug 2014 02:59:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 02:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Michael Reilly , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 12 04:59:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XH2Iq-0003Jw-BF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 04:59:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38853 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XH2Iq-0000E3-2i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:59:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45248) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XH2Ij-0000DX-Eh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:59:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XH2If-0000yY-6B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:59:05 -0400 Original-Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:33548 helo=snark.thyrsus.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XH2If-0000yU-2U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5F28C3806C1; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:58:30 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r40migqm.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 71.162.243.5 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173584 Archived-At: Stephen J. Turnbull : > Paul Michael Reilly writes: > > > Am I wrong, and it is intuitively obvious how we are going to deal > > with git and branches, rebasing, reviews, etc? > > Having observed several of these transitions, including Emacs's > CVS->Bazaar transition, it's really not a problem as long as the git > fans accept that several major contributors just want a CVS-like > workflow, and git commands that implement that workflow are explained > in straightforward terms. Furthermore, the workflow documentation is already up on the wiki. That's one of the first things I did. -- Eric S. Raymond