From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eric S. Raymond" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"? Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 22:40:24 -0500 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs Message-ID: <20140303034024.GA8371@thyrsus.com> References: <87fvn17gbc.fsf@slice.rozzin.com> <83ppm5tfsg.fsf@gnu.org> <87ob1pywn7.fsf@slice.rozzin.com> <83k3ccts3p.fsf@gnu.org> <8738j0ihjn.fsf@igel.home> <83bnxotk5o.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3ccgvc6.fsf@igel.home> <8338j0tho7.fsf@gnu.org> <87fvn0gsed.fsf@igel.home> <831tykt0n6.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393818062 17654 80.91.229.3 (3 Mar 2014 03:41:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 03:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: handa@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Andreas Schwab , rozzin@geekspace.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 03 04:41:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WKJkd-0000zv-GZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 04:41:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37639 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKJkd-0007XF-6d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:41:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKJkX-0007UY-6a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:41:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKJkS-0003Wk-QU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:41:04 -0500 Original-Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:41735 helo=snark.thyrsus.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKJkO-0003VZ-3h; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:40:56 -0500 Original-Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 12FB0380E1C; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 22:40:24 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <831tykt0n6.fsf@gnu.org> X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 71.162.243.5 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170086 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii : > > It cannot be the on the same branch, since it's not a plain number > > (handa@gnu.org-20130320075820-0qzn1jnrqj0y2g4m is on the same branch). > > Yes, that's true. I thought Eric wanted the original commit, even if > it was on another branch. But if he wants the corresponding trunk > commit, then yes, you are right. I expect the trunk commit is what a person reading that comment would want to refer back to - but, as previously noted, the question gets a bit philosophical. -- Eric S. Raymond