From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default behaviour of RET. Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:23:12 +0000 Message-ID: <20131023202312.GB4175@acm.acm> References: <8361sqli02.fsf@gnu.org> <1730ebf3-db44-498c-b2a9-4d288d83a946@default> <87k3h6xuen.fsf@yandex.ru> <1878e4fa-50f2-4655-a4ff-30d1db708ee8@default> <5D2595BD-AC11-4FB6-B363-31EBE28A0AE0@mit.edu> <5265A6E1.90405@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1382559996 7012 80.91.229.3 (23 Oct 2013 20:26:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, "emacs-devel@gnu.org devel" , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii , chad , Drew Adams To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 23 22:26:39 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ50o-00048E-W3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:26:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51337 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ50o-0003Zk-Iu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:26:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58867) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ508-0003UL-CY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:26:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ4zV-0006ob-Ij for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:25:56 -0400 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:34995 helo=mail.muc.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ4zV-0006jj-0o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:25:17 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 33727 invoked by uid 3782); 23 Oct 2013 20:25:15 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p5492CAD2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.146.202.210]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:25:15 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 4336 invoked by uid 1000); 23 Oct 2013 20:23:12 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5265A6E1.90405@dancol.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 8.x X-Received-From: 193.149.48.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164490 Archived-At: Hi, Daniel. On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:12:49PM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote: > I agree. It's not by coincidence that every other popular editing > environment indents on RET. Why would you _want_ to insert a new line > and not indent it? If you're in text mode, or you're in a programming mode and want, for example, some comments to start at column zero. > While we're at it, can we bind C-l and C-o to more generally useful > commands? NO!! I use these commands a lot. :-) -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).