From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xue Fuqiao Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: About refcards Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 22:12:56 +0800 Organization: The Church of Emacs Message-ID: <20130302221256.d77bcab893abc4f06030436c@gmail.com> References: <20130302204908.2ab7e850a828441010c048bb@gmail.com> <837glquehp.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362233590 4949 80.91.229.3 (2 Mar 2013 14:13:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 14:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 02 15:13:34 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UBnBs-0006br-PR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:13:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53917 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UBnBX-0001c5-DC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:13:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52159) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UBnBU-0001bm-52 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:13:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UBnBS-000360-K2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:13:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-da0-f49.google.com ([209.85.210.49]:50297) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UBnBR-00035L-4M; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:13:05 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-da0-f49.google.com with SMTP id t11so1808038daj.8 for ; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 06:13:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:organization:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZjwleOjOeYrQ1cMALMb7b67hktqnZlXGP+q9PjBPPLc=; b=jo8wR1q305GkYClhoCxl62BtNLNYlvSmZqJ3voNFP0+WNfZvwNG43HOV6zkNJDaRqv +lwQYc3WTDRKadHQM54U1hO7Um9CKYoxPFCHoWU22fc6nep6HkMI35kHfp3wkH71YqxM fNd7mxAQ4w+bYE4ZBrj8ze14tuqq0NN8x5D5YxaRznjwkG4ALL5BuM/6QGb9IVgx8PGK eQpVWp4GdN/F6DYXjV+9ZnD3QnOsFAbX+/5r9zzncMFX7JQNJBHZf7SB2q/GPUFVzXSX op4ck9p4n0B5iO0+o8nkCK4cY+I5rs9u49oD9xt39AQXveM7o4HROR5uQJBJ4DcTyty+ E8Xg== X-Received: by 10.66.184.208 with SMTP id ew16mr24129380pac.19.1362233584415; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 06:13:04 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Emacs ([123.114.122.252]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rr14sm15661907pbb.34.2013.03.02.06.13.00 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Mar 2013 06:13:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <837glquehp.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.210.49 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157483 Archived-At: On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:18:26 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 20:49:08 +0800 > > From: Xue Fuqiao > > > > In etc/refcards/, most refcards are generated in pdf format, but some refcards (e.g., survival.tex) aren't generated. Why did this inconsistency appear? Why not generate all or none of them? > The PDF files are produced only for those *.tex files that need > support for languages other than English, because many people don't > have the relevant TeX packages installed. > IOW, we initially had none of the PDF files there, until someone said > that producing sk-refcard.pdf didn't work without specialized TeX > packages. Thanks for your explanation, but there are also some English ones here. -- Best regards, Xue Fuqiao. http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/XueFuqiao