From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Masatake YAMATO Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [patch] minor patch for register.el Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:18:07 +0900 (JST) Organization: Red Hat Japan, Inc. Message-ID: <20130220.111807.1912441579815160723.yamato@redhat.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361326697 26973 80.91.229.3 (20 Feb 2013 02:18:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: drew.adams@oracle.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 20 03:18:40 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U7zGZ-0003TA-Ni for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 03:18:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52225 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7zGF-0000gT-Gz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:18:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47904) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7zG9-0000fH-GC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:18:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7zG7-00045L-VE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:18:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7zG7-00045C-Ms for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:18:11 -0500 Original-Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1K2I9ha011054 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:18:09 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (dhcp-193-145.nrt.redhat.com [10.64.193.145]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1K2I7OB015330; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:18:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.11 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157182 Archived-At: Hi, ( I'm cheering those who are working on improving register:) I used to try but I could not show a good result[1][2]. I still believe register facility should be imporved massively. ) > 4. In `list-registers': Raise error if `register-alist' is empty. Just question. Is this error raising really needed? `list-processes' says nothing even if no child process is. `list-directory' says nothing even if the directory given as argument is empty. [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-03/msg00345.html [2] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-03/msg00349.html Masatake YAMATO