From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xue Fuqiao Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Obsolete redisplay-end-trigger and lazy-lock.el Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 00:02:15 +0800 Organization: The Church of Emacs Message-ID: <20130202000215.fa9d9fa3c04c3349d0bfaeea@gmail.com> References: <510B7BAD.6010908@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359734552 2930 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2013 16:02:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dmitry Antipov , Emacs development discussions To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 01 17:02:52 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U1J4k-0005Vt-EX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:02:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43194 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1J4S-0004LK-Au for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:02:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55483) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1J4P-0004LD-UB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:02:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1J4N-000453-SZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:02:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:52795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1J4N-00044V-LF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:02:27 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id hz1so1401736pad.24 for ; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:02:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:organization:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yPQyityPnBYMtkdtrWO3LWEDbYI6AkF5/mqNpKMXfog=; b=Luj4TTEIi3vP/uBvBFD+mDsswDo/8tKVWelIksCts1WlTNNNs54qeT/2izcxlZ+qg6 9Lb+cdu/e6XStnp8+QGWfT0Zc0h9YjPLLgtjIvV/rBM9BzST8LsPYuE7oiXTaK+ANTCK RVEKtULpQODmKRzQ9Fr6WQqRe2rpGNJBmlgCFdmKJe+xVSgd3JOlz6q/xQnUIZiDPFH7 4YRO/dsgGGrtm6Ygft0cc2uRqKtG7TJ+VJjwkzL+DiUME9fszizeUXapBcyywFrw0rHM Kn7IVELkNrGV3OLw+cTyyEymFG12M99ZWcx/n31pC6BUrDcqZr64L+aW9M3pZ3pmolb1 YpwQ== X-Received: by 10.68.243.33 with SMTP id wv1mr33591774pbc.143.1359734546347; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:02:26 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Emacs ([49.118.21.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rv8sm8815723pbc.27.2013.02.01.08.02.20 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:02:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.220.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156763 Archived-At: On Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:39:21 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: > For Emacs-24.1, we dropped the "obsolete since Emacs-21" but not the > "obsolete since Emacs-22", so I think I'd rather not do that yet. Does that apply to every Emacs major version? I mean for emacs-nn, we will drop the "obsolete since emacs-{nn-3}". -- Best regards, Xue Fuqiao. http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/XueFuqiao