From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= Delafond Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dual licensing of Org manual? Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:02:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20121214090220.GE20665@frisco.mine.nu> References: <87hanpwpm8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <877golv9st.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <4z1uetzh6l.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87a9thtujd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= Delafond NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355497825 9230 80.91.229.3 (14 Dec 2012 15:10:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bastien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 14 16:10:39 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjWuN-0006qZ-0j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:10:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40000 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjWu9-00079z-U3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:10:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45473) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjRAF-0006dp-Om for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:02:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjRAD-0003Hu-D3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:02:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:56588) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjRA5-0003G7-Qj; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 04:02:29 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id xa7so2056013pbc.0 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:02:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GeIYJnTBJvYUf04A4GefPXAo7FKenbuoQOR5UrwDF2k=; b=U3ondskyLMnR2OlEthwGqA2uUBQU+ai9je9/DyXah49ixKTcXNCy+Z9eQE2LrR3ntu CGdkFbeILtjn/kekMMhzIf19pXn8UbcYWPaOYKz9ZwAZfJ6KmWon2tkSsiruAHCGx1VG JqsMpcZAhZiuHoidQPmzqypC1MdSF+ZGRQ83a04svpwNBwd/B9q0Ci672k9RKUmm5T1k XIFnWCJuKOhgN0/FMyMBxY4SWxlaVSyIC3mJgp4EUgP5FQsp6IsIgrCPJm4bvZMUfh0I BxF2Ony6YG5E2JOpc2/QJoOyfHUih5CTVxjlW3YlCHj448SgKzggt+44lA9Oq27xJJrr VYDQ== Original-Received: by 10.68.244.6 with SMTP id xc6mr13899079pbc.94.1355475748088; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:02:28 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from pool.mine.nu ([74.123.29.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ni8sm2596857pbc.70.2012.12.14.01.02.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:02:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from proliant.mine.nu ([74.123.29.134] helo=frisco.mine.nu) by pool.mine.nu with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TjRA0-0001sF-Je; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:02:24 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a9thtujd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.160.41 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:10:25 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155549 Archived-At: On Dec/14, Bastien wrote: > > It's possible that the GNU position may have softened wrt > > invariant sections and cover texts. GFDL with no invariant > > sections and no cover texts is acceptable for Debian "free" IIUC. > > Sebastien, do you confirm this? that is correct, per http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001. Cheers, --Seb