From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs revision #107149 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:42:26 +0000 Message-ID: <20120213214225.GE26954@acm.acm> References: <20120210232039.GC4340@acm.acm> <87pqdlbby2.fsf@gnus.org> <20120211195927.GA3969@acm.acm> <87zkcnhjfw.fsf@gnus.org> <20120212222238.GA2810@acm.acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329169385 19258 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2012 21:43:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-cc-mode@gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 13 22:43:04 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx3fl-0003yV-Nw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:42:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57647 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx3fh-0004gD-UU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:42:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44334) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx3fe-0004fo-7k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:42:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx3fc-0004gd-Ss for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:42:50 -0500 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:22719 helo=mail.muc.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rx3fc-0004g1-8n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:42:48 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 80350 invoked by uid 3782); 13 Feb 2012 21:42:46 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (pD951B712.dip.t-dialin.net [217.81.183.18]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:42:44 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 6422 invoked by uid 1000); 13 Feb 2012 21:42:26 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 193.149.48.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148584 Archived-At: On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:15:18PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Actually, a real fix to this problem involves adding new a font-lock > function, which I like to call font-lock-ensure-fontification, which > mm-view would then call to force immediate fontification of the > specified region. This function would know how to handle jit-lock, > lazy-lock, and whichever other accelerator we come up with. I Don't understand. Why is the forcing of immediate fontification ever necessary? That's what JIT lock does, isn't it? > Such a functionality is also needed in other packages, such as > in htmlfontify. We have a bug report for this, but I can't find it > any more. > Stefan -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).