From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Werner LEMBERG Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr vs. git repository Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:04:20 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <20110101.120420.360108937.wl@gnu.org> References: <83zkrlosry.fsf@gnu.org> <20110101.105445.492149087.wl@gnu.org> <83wrmportz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293879874 31570 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2011 11:04:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 11:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: eliz@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 01 12:04:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PYzG9-0001oh-Ma for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 12:04:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41817 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PYzG9-0007MX-1X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 06:04:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36029 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PYzG2-0007MS-DP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 06:04:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYzG0-0002UR-JW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 06:04:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:38201 helo=mail.gmx.net) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYzG0-0002U2-6R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 06:04:20 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Jan 2011 11:04:18 -0000 Original-Received: from 178-191-184-200.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO localhost) [178.191.184.200] by mail.gmx.net (mp071) with SMTP; 01 Jan 2011 12:04:18 +0100 X-Authenticated: #54312696 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/dd+V/ORXd8+D2Iw24fjQQdWS5qRQRe1JjhYs/rS EUrR1besligNM0 In-Reply-To: <83wrmportz.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3.50 on Emacs 24.0.50.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134103 Archived-At: > Posting this on the Bazaar mailing list would be TRT, IMO. It's > always a Good Thing to get the developers think about getting their > software more efficient. But posting this here can never make bzr > hog less of the bandwidth, so I don't see why would you do this > except to tease. RMS explicitly has asked for that info a few months ago, and only now I was able to provide it for various reasons. Since the discussion then happened on this very list, I found it appropriate to post it here too. I suggest to forget the whole issue. Werner