From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Werner LEMBERG Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr vs. git repository Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:54:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <20110101.105445.492149087.wl@gnu.org> References: <20110101.092838.211465745.wl@gnu.org> <83zkrlosry.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293875700 18932 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2011 09:55:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 09:55:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: eliz@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 01 10:54:56 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PYyAp-0006IJ-Ns for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:54:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53532 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PYyAp-00083d-0h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 04:54:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48882 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PYyAh-00083Y-I5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 04:54:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYyAf-0007jl-Iz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 04:54:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:49407 helo=mail.gmx.net) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYyAf-0007jP-6m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 04:54:45 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Jan 2011 09:54:43 -0000 Original-Received: from 178-191-184-200.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO localhost) [178.191.184.200] by mail.gmx.net (mp022) with SMTP; 01 Jan 2011 10:54:43 +0100 X-Authenticated: #54312696 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19EJV5uXolEcWGDNVf0YsmW9ju3tDthVKLUQyFdWj GndFLp1NHTctbV In-Reply-To: <83zkrlosry.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3.50 on Emacs 24.0.50.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134099 Archived-At: >> As you can see, bzr still needs about three times more bandwidth in >> both receiving and sending... > > I don't think this will convince anyone to switch, but frankly, I no > longer understand what is all that fuss with git's speed. I don't want to convince anyone, I just report the issue. You are overreacting. Werner