From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Werner LEMBERG Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: bzr vs. git repository Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:28:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <20110101.092838.211465745.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293870528 3953 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2011 08:28:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 08:28:48 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 01 09:28:45 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PYwpQ-0006hK-Id for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:28:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42693 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PYwpP-0004HA-KU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 03:28:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44038 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PYwpJ-0004FO-9j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 03:28:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYwpI-0004Ct-35 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 03:28:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:50420 helo=mail.gmx.net) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYwpH-0004Ci-MO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 03:28:36 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Jan 2011 08:28:34 -0000 Original-Received: from 178-191-184-200.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO localhost) [178.191.184.200] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 01 Jan 2011 09:28:34 +0100 X-Authenticated: #54312696 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX191ZgkduUZ1BkVQw1tNQqsmsQNPGWNzc4Rj19Q1Sz J9lU5I6/WSbSUz X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3.50 on Emacs 24.0.50.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134097 Archived-At: I've now done a comparison between the network traffic of git and bzr, using nethogs. git pull (git://repo.or.cz/emacs.git, git version 1.7.1.78) : Update from commit 6be816dee8c9720dc39ff235b7b31d4190e06d57 Author: Stefan Monnier Date: Fri Dec 10 15:00:25 2010 -0500 to commit 2d33d18337320f5c0cd1c0627caa6528f7050b29 Author: Michael Albinus Date: Fri Dec 31 20:57:05 2010 +0100 sent: 194k received: 6400k bzr pull (bzr+ssh, bzr version 2.0.5): Update from revno: 102636 committer: Glenn Morris branch nick: trunk timestamp: Fri 2010-12-10 18:54:07 -0800 to revno: 102734 committer: Chong Yidong branch nick: trunk timestamp: Sat 2011-01-01 01:02:36 -0500 sent: 512k received: 19357k As you can see, bzr still needs about three times more bandwidth in both receiving and sending... Werner