From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tak Ota Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: collect-string Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:07:59 -0800 Message-ID: <20101203.180759.320867153.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> References: <20101203.151540.127977418.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291428538 8891 80.91.229.12 (4 Dec 2010 02:08:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 02:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 04 03:08:54 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POhYT-0006KN-Jd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 03:08:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57025 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1POhYS-00079H-Tp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 21:08:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35692 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1POhXy-00077g-9W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 21:08:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1POhXZ-0004Y0-Jk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 21:08:22 -0500 Original-Received: from am1ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com ([213.199.154.209]:45034 helo=AM1EHSOBE006.bigfish.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1POhXZ-0004Xl-Du for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 21:07:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail66-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.253) by AM1EHSOBE006.bigfish.com (10.3.204.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 02:07:55 +0000 Original-Received: from mail66-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail66-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEBF19E85CD; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 02:07:55 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -16 X-BigFish: VPS-16(zz1432N98dN4015Lzz1202hzzz2fh2a8h668h61h) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPVD:NLI; H:mail7.fw-bc.sony.com; RD:mail7.fw-bc.sony.com; EFVD:NLI Original-Received: from mail66-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail66-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1291428475510487_14759; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 02:07:55 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from AM1EHSMHS006.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.244]) by mail66-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C959A4804E; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 02:07:55 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from mail7.fw-bc.sony.com (160.33.98.74) by AM1EHSMHS006.bigfish.com (10.3.207.106) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.8; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 02:07:54 +0000 Original-Received: from mail1x.bc.in.sel.sony.com ([43.144.65.112]) by mail7.fw-bc.sony.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.3.2mp) with ESMTP id oB427rjB020409 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 02:07:53 GMT Original-Received: from localhost (tak-vaio-z1290-043191017095.am.sony.com [43.191.17.95]) by mail1x.bc.in.sel.sony.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id oB427qnf021267; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 02:07:52 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew-6.3.50 on Emacs-23.2.90.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.1.7600 built on 2010-11-22) X-OriginatorOrg: am.sony.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP2+, XP SP1+ (seldom 98) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133383 Archived-At: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 18:01:01 -0800: Stefan Monnier wrote: > > OK, done. Indeed its cleaner. > > Thanks, installed in the trunk. Thank you. > The next step would probably be to try and handle the remaining > differences between normal occur behavior and the new "collect" > behavior, mostly the presence of line numbers. Maybe we could try and > move the line numbers out of the buffer's content into the margin to > help resolve this problem. For now I'll leave that work to someone who is more familiar with how occur works than I :) -Tak