From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thorsten Bonow Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Recommended gnus spam filter system? Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:42:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <20100902.214223.420894923.thorsten.bonow@withouthat.org> References: <87r5hcc98o.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87bp8g2c41.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8739tsosyg.fsf_-_@maguirefamily.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283499928 25053 80.91.229.12 (3 Sep 2010 07:45:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 07:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: camm@maguirefamily.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 03 09:45:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrQxd-0003c9-7H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:45:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41214 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OrQxc-0000CC-2t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:45:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59506 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OrFgN-0006oC-Gf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:42:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrFgG-00088G-E0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:42:47 -0400 Original-Received: from h93074.serverkompetenz.net ([81.169.138.67]:42807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrFgG-00086t-8q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:42:40 -0400 Original-Received: by h93074.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix, from userid 5001) id AAFC63B82C2; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 21:42:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from catweazle (pD9E257AC.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.87.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h93074.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DC6A3B806E; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 21:42:25 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=toto) by catweazle with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OrFfz-00070z-SU; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:42:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8739tsosyg.fsf_-_@maguirefamily.org> X-Face: ,i\0yx1|cRm0qV.lmJ%Z(_0e-.@or]1; 7lZof/?"lf; yH3U0}^Fl+-=1/VPQ8u2aW-k_q3V +YG_z3tmNc,QQg=F`wZg9ZufzHu/CJ?(sz5h>5@5juZnD'V/Jxe#$B<{ X-Mailer: Mew version 7.0.50 on Emacs 23.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:45:13 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129628 Archived-At: >>>>> "Camm" == Camm Maguire writes: Camm> Greetings! What is the preferred method of dealing with Camm> spam under gnus? I.e. what are most people using with Camm> satisfaction? Camm> ========================================================== Camm> "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." Camm> -- Baha'u'llah Greetings, Earthling! The preferred method of dealing with spam under GNUS is recommending to ask questions about it in a GNUS related newsgroup, e.g. "gnu.emacs.gnus" instead of a mailing list concerned with the development (and not the use) of GNU Emacs. Toto -- "We apologise for the inconvenience" (God's Final Message to His Creation) Douglas Adams: So long, and thanks for all the fish