From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Iustin Pop Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] etags: Add a small list of interpretors for Python Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:53:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20100901115332.GI21939@google.com> References: <20100819153606.GO4157@google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283342534 19073 80.91.229.12 (1 Sep 2010 12:02:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:02:14 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 01 14:02:11 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oqm13-0006dy-7B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:02:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48963 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oqm0x-0001ht-Ll for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:02:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49222 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OqltD-000681-Gy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:54:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oqlsr-0000VC-7q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:53:48 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.44.51]:30059) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oqlsr-0000UZ-4Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:53:41 -0400 Original-Received: from kpbe19.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe19.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.83]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o81BrcIE017776 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 04:53:38 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1283342018; bh=TGlogAAh6nqX7ARPB01IrVEvrCM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=nQmGLsAuxYG8FFmWyHb9YYdquo372s7dcHsz76qM7TO94UT0vUhhZgcm52jSY21hn dRftNrCzAD91+2JdB+LIQ== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent:x-system-of-record; b=A/7SJX3EiFHXkPqJfyl9T1/D69aVANkzKD4XrlQmPws1NCQO0PY8IUgVPZvpcDzdu ZTeNbRWaj+hy4OSDEfTwg== Original-Received: from wyf19 (wyf19.prod.google.com [10.241.226.83]) by kpbe19.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o81BraNw024212 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 04:53:37 -0700 Original-Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so14517367wyf.1 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:53:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.216.52.135 with SMTP id e7mr7735438wec.98.1283342015866; Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:53:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from google.com (rrr.zrh.corp.google.com [172.16.74.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o49sm6068623wej.43.2010.09.01.04.53.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100819153606.GO4157@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-System-Of-Record: true X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:01:27 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129551 Archived-At: On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 05:36:06PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: > Currently, etags has no interpretors defined for Python, which prevents > it from recognising Python scripts that have no extension. This patch > adds a small list of interpretors for this language, which while not > perfect (e.g. it will fail on specific versions like python2.4), it is > better than the current situation where all scripts without an extension > will default to Fortran. > > Note: I debated adding a more detailed list, but it would get outdated > quickly, so I left just these three versions. A regular expression for > the interpreter name would be much better here, would implementing that > make sense? > > [please keep me CC-ed, I'm not subscribed to the list] Ping? Is this the wrong list? thanks! iustin