From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Joe Brenner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: coding guidelines? (was Re: Key bindings proposal) Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:45:11 -0700 Message-ID: <201007311945.o6VJjBjY083548@kzsu.stanford.edu> References: <19534.1494.627000.357123@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <201007300204.o6U24Htf048494@kzsu.stanford.edu> <87ocdptivg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <201007311919.o6VJJbGT083196@kzsu.stanford.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280605526 13108 80.91.229.12 (31 Jul 2010 19:45:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 31 21:45:23 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfHzm-0000aE-7S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:45:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34922 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OfHzl-0003ZF-Jh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:45:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39913 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OfHzf-0003WP-CV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:45:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfHzd-0006xU-Rs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:45:15 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp4.stanford.edu ([171.67.219.84]:60749 helo=smtp.stanford.edu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfHzd-0006xB-JS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:45:13 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B8891A595F; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from kzsu.stanford.edu (KZSU.Stanford.EDU [171.66.118.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 023041A57D5; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from kzsu.stanford.edu (localhost.stanford.edu [127.0.0.1]) by kzsu.stanford.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o6VJjBjY083548; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:45:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doom@kzsu.stanford.edu) In-reply-to: <201007311919.o6VJJbGT083196@kzsu.stanford.edu> Comments: In-reply-to Joe Brenner message dated "Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:19:37 -0700." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.2; GNU Emacs 24.0.50 X-Spam: Probability=8%, Report=' BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_400_499 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, MISSING_HEADERS 0, TO_MALFORMED 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1 0, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_2 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0' X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128066 Archived-At: Joe Brenner wrote: > I think what's going on in footnote.el is that they wanted the new > bindings in it's own map which is associated with a new minor mode. > > That approach makes a little more sense to me (for my immediate problem, > anyway), but I'm a little puzzled that the minor mode bindings don't go > away when you shut off the minor mode. Oops, spoke too soon. I had some cruft in my code that was causing that problem. Sorry.