unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: tomas@tuxteam.de
To: Daniel Colascione <daniel@censorshipresearch.org>
Cc: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org>,
	Emacs development discussions <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use tail pointer for LOOP (Was: Re: O(N^2) behavior in LOOP)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:44:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100616174420.GA2847@tomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C01B609.6070303@censorshipresearch.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 08:49:13PM -0400, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> On 5/29/10 8:45 PM, Ken Raeburn wrote:

[...]

> > Is it any faster to build the list in order? (Simply avoiding nreverse
> > obviously makes things a little faster, but are you doing more work each
> > time around the loop to maintain and use the tail pointer?)
> 
> It's only a little bit more work to use the tail pointer [...]

This has intrigued me for quite a while.

Since I really should be doing tax declarations, I couldn't hold back for
longer -- here is my (very unscientific) approach, to help you all
procrastinate a bit too:

 | (defun copy1 (lst)
 |   "Build up a copy of lst by consing up in reverse order, then
 | reversing"
 |   (let ((res))
 |     (while lst
 |       (setq res (cons (car lst) res)
 |             lst (cdr lst)))
 |     (nreverse res)))
 | 
 | (defun copy2 (lst)
 |   "Build up a copy of lst by consing up in order, keeping a tail
 | pointer"
 |   (when lst
 |     (let ((res) (tail))
 |       (setq res (cons (car lst) nil)
 |             tail res
 |             lst (cdr lst))
 |       (while lst
 |         (setcdr tail (cons (car lst) nil))
 |         (setq tail (cdr tail)
 |               lst (cdr lst)))
 |       res)))
 | 
 | (defun runtwo (n)
 |   (let ((lst))
 |     (while (> n 0)
 |       (setq lst (cons n lst)
 |             n (1- n)))
 |     (garbage-collect)
 |     (cons (benchmark-run (copy1 lst)) 
 |           (benchmark-run (copy2 lst)))))
 | 
 | (runtwo 1000000)

(Maybe the tail pointer version could be done more elegantly: I'd be
delighted to be taught more :)

Turns out that the nreverse version is a tad faster (on my hardware, one
of those Atom based netbooks, in case it matters) -- about 2.1 versus
2.7 seconds for a list of size 10^6. Garbage collections are comparable.

For the very curious (and to add some scientific varnish to this ;-),
here's my Emacs:

  GNU Emacs 23.1.91.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.12.12)
  of 2010-01-11 on elegiac, modified by Debian

Enjoy -- and may this keep you too from doing more important things ;-)

Regards
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFMGQ10Bcgs9XrR2kYRAoRdAJoCbSaPZ2eUX6QiKKDW1NjQGV3G8gCfca9C
tyyHzMbrUJopGOPzwTEJUjs=
=ZBiq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-16 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-29 21:56 O(N^2) behavior in LOOP Daniel Colascione
2010-05-29 22:06 ` Daniel Colascione
2010-05-29 22:14   ` Lennart Borgman
2010-05-29 22:35   ` Geoff Gole
2010-05-29 23:58     ` [PATCH] use tail pointer for LOOP (Was: Re: O(N^2) behavior in LOOP) Daniel Colascione
2010-05-30  0:45       ` Ken Raeburn
2010-05-30  0:49         ` Daniel Colascione
2010-06-16 17:44           ` tomas [this message]
2010-06-16 18:10             ` [PATCH] use tail pointer for LOOP David Kastrup
2010-06-17  5:10               ` tomas
2010-06-17  7:18                 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2010-06-17  9:22                   ` tomas
2010-06-17 10:03                     ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2010-06-17 14:05                       ` tomas
2010-06-17 15:16                         ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2010-06-17 10:12                     ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2010-06-17 20:48                 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-06-18  7:07                   ` David Kastrup
2010-06-18 13:40                     ` Stefan Monnier
2010-05-30 17:05       ` Štěpán Němec
2010-05-30 17:09         ` Daniel Colascione

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100616174420.GA2847@tomas \
    --to=tomas@tuxteam.de \
    --cc=daniel@censorshipresearch.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=raeburn@raeburn.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).