From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why deleting overlays before kill-buffer? Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:28:01 +0200 Message-ID: <201006041228.01635.tassilo@member.fsf.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275647304 13437 80.91.229.12 (4 Jun 2010 10:28:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:28:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lennart Borgman To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 04 12:28:23 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKU8T-00026B-Rh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:28:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51491 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OKU8T-0007CA-0X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 06:28:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36094 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OKU8E-00079u-9j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 06:28:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKU8D-0000kr-8g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 06:28:06 -0400 Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.64.15]:15507) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKU8D-0000kW-40 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 06:28:05 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F7278A48DB; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:28:03 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from deliver.uni-koblenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (deliver.uni-koblenz.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30965-02; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:28:03 +0200 (CEST) X-CHKRCPT: Envelopesender noch tassilo@member.fsf.org Original-Received: from thinkpad.localnet (tsdh.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.67.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by deliver.uni-koblenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0936778A48CB; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:28:03 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.34-gentoo; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: X-Face: `TY6r/ws=N5uqO1E`M=Sups<}n%T[E^o_?MJj List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125502 Archived-At: On Friday 04 June 2010 11:38:35 Lennart Borgman wrote: Hi Lennart, > Is there any reason to delete overlays when kill-buffer is called > (like re-builder does)? In the general case, no overlays are deleted when killing a buffer. But re-builder adds a cleanup function `reb-kill-buffer' to `kill-buffer-hook' to do that, because killing the re-builder buffer should remove the overlays it has created in some *other* buffer. To me, that is quite plausible. Or do I get something wrong? Bye, Tassilo