From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is there something like `on-display-functions'? Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:27:46 +0000 Message-ID: <20100128102746.GB2285@muc.de> References: <20100127135716.GA3432@muc.de> <20100127153733.GD3432@muc.de> <83iqan4elq.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264674082 7456 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2010 10:21:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 28 11:21:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NaRV0-00062g-79 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:21:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38989 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NaRUz-0005TJ-E2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:21:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NaRUq-0005SU-3U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:21:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NaRUk-0005Ok-NM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:21:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43813 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NaRUk-0005Oc-H2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:2948 helo=mail.muc.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NaRUk-0007BI-5k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 57703 invoked by uid 3782); 28 Jan 2010 10:21:00 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (pD9E225E1.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.37.225]) by colin2.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:20:59 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 3076 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Jan 2010 10:27:46 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83iqan4elq.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.5 (Fettercairn) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120557 Archived-At: On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 07:55:29PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Yes, it[fontification_functions]'s called regardless. It's actually > part of the normal redisplay operation, whereby .... Thanks! That was a very clear explanation. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).