From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Werner LEMBERG Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `bzr viz' slooow Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:30:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <20100127.123024.170021878.wl@gnu.org> References: <20100127.070205.124081201.wl@gnu.org> <87pr4vvm4g.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264591901 22062 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2010 11:31:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: ofv@wanadoo.es Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 27 12:31:34 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Na67P-0005xq-H6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:31:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47699 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Na67Q-00074s-Bj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:31:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Na66Q-0006Vd-39 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:30:30 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Na66L-0006RK-84 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:30:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50036 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Na66K-0006Qw-Uk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:30:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:51017) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Na66K-0007Pn-AF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:30:24 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2010 11:30:22 -0000 Original-Received: from 77-20-101-42-dynip.superkabel.de (EHLO localhost) [77.20.101.42] by mail.gmx.net (mp069) with SMTP; 27 Jan 2010 12:30:22 +0100 X-Authenticated: #54312696 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/ew8AihcDeB6olRx2dlC19oSTOrtalrUgseQSgaE BJcLABHQZ1OIRb In-Reply-To: <87pr4vvm4g.fsf@telefonica.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.53 on Emacs 23.1.50.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.70999999999999996 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120492 Archived-At: >> Maybe. However, it is quite generic and basically independent of >> the version of bzr. In other words, it uses calls to the bzr >> infrastructure to get the data. > > And why do you think that it is bzr the main culprit? Haven't you > seen the timings about qlog, which does the same thing but much > faster? I'll try qlog. > Have you forgotten about the possibility of displaying the graph at > the same time that the data is collected, the same way gitk does? I've suggested exactly that on the bzr-gtk mailing list meanwhile. > Or is this about blaming bzr and make it look bad? Not at all. However, gtk and not qt is the primary graphical environment recommended for GNU projects, right? From a political point of view, bzr-gtk should thus be the preferred tool... >> Either your machine is much faster than mine, or you have `light' >> checkout. > > Actually, building the graph on a lightweight checkout of a remote > branch will require *much* more time. OK. Werner