From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Werner LEMBERG Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `bzr viz' slooow Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:16:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <20100126.231626.78379055.wl@gnu.org> References: <20100126.180554.173876640.wl@gnu.org> <877hr4ww3c.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264545913 3276 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2010 22:45:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: ofv@wanadoo.es Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 26 23:45:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NZu9h-0002LB-04 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:45:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49676 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZtwm-0005HM-0q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:31:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZtq3-0001v4-V1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:24:48 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZtpz-0001tM-6T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:24:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59018 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZtpy-0001tF-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:24:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:47706) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NZtpv-00030x-GM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:24:42 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2010 22:16:25 -0000 Original-Received: from 77-20-101-42-dynip.superkabel.de (EHLO localhost) [77.20.101.42] by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 26 Jan 2010 23:16:25 +0100 X-Authenticated: #54312696 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19ypsJ+rMNyIjqpSh0wW7GijfgZ4qGGmZM9MkoEsq MaSdFgyiV3v7iK In-Reply-To: <877hr4ww3c.fsf@telefonica.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.53 on Emacs 23.1.50.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.69999999999999996 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120468 Archived-At: > In any case I wouldn't expect to match the performance of git, > though. Well... > BTW, "less than a minute" qualifies as an slow operation for > me, so git slow, BUT: gitk displays something useful (the most recent commits) after a few seconds, and I can start to inspect the data; apparently a background process collects the remaining commit entries. It takes about a minute if you press the `End' button to see the very first commit in the whole repository. On the other hand, `bzr viz' is unusable for really five minutes. > bzr is sloow (note just one extra `o') In the light of my previous paragraph, I strongly disagree. bzr is sloooow (note the four `o's); it takes 50 times more time until I can actually do something. Werner