From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Werner LEMBERG Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BZR error! Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:33:49 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <20100104.163349.117469617.wl@gnu.org> References: <4B4203A0.20402@alice.it> <87bph96gar.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262619373 13099 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2010 15:36:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: tassilo@member.fsf.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 04 16:36:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NRoyL-000815-Qs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:36:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59705 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRoyF-0001EI-Ac for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:35:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRowC-0008Kh-GF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:33:44 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRow7-0008Hd-JL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:33:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40972 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRow7-0008HS-DQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:33:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:48174) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NRow6-0008Cb-PB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:33:39 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Jan 2010 15:33:36 -0000 Original-Received: from 77-20-101-42-dynip.superkabel.de (EHLO localhost) [77.20.101.42] by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 04 Jan 2010 16:33:36 +0100 X-Authenticated: #54312696 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19YGStCbzJYZblyXu77ijdFuREdA3aUsZl6O8P9be SEHG7NZRJaXVfY In-Reply-To: <87bph96gar.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.53 on Emacs 23.1.50.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.7 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119359 Archived-At: >> PS - What have we gained migrating from CVS to BAZAAR? Why not >> SVN, which is simpler than BAZAAR? > > Because SVN uses a central repository just like CVS does, and we > wanted to have a decentralized version control system, which are a > bit more complicated by their nature. The question is rather, from a practical point of view: Why have migrated to Bazaar and not to git? Up to now, the whole issue is just a political decision (which I really, really don't like) with ENDLESS pain. Werner