From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xavier Maillard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: completions - remove window after use? Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:36:10 +0100 Organization: GNU's Not UNIX! Message-ID: <200911122236.nACMaAKh021878@fed.local> References: <61C01A08-8FB6-4908-B9F1-B9F1CE3E3D92@gmail.com> <4AFBC50D.1060007@gmx.at> Reply-To: Xavier Maillard NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258065370 18269 80.91.229.12 (12 Nov 2009 22:36:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: david.reitter@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 12 23:36:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N8iGo-0007vx-RB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:36:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54118 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N8iGo-0002FW-AV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:36:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N8iGi-0002Da-HM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:35:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N8iGf-00029S-0E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:35:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46737 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N8iGe-00029P-RT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:35:52 -0500 Original-Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:58453) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N8iGe-0007tk-GI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:35:52 -0500 Original-Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF19C0101; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:35:51 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:35:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:subject:reply-to:references; s=smtpout; bh=iXwQjm/UDwcVi0E5ICYYGhiJBxY=; b=WCWun3jUKp+L4XqZCkGhQYrAMqOyDe0YF0h/x3Ano/3db+qbvA0MIgcHmDyad59IE91WA+XwjzxwQ9cT2CNLZ6Yc+2OTGuY9WR0K+i9wtILsO+UJSZ/GMnwc5Q1MfwRZOnIn/7sdxm51PksCuo6eLieY1tiDbtDtvH4dl/FOFTk= X-Sasl-enc: lLqbVWZd6p8it8a7pIGQz1Se4O5O7+Eb9NyEae/z4+HW 1258065351 Original-Received: from fed.local (cha51-2-82-244-211-40.fbx.proxad.net [82.244.211.40]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6912F4AD73E; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:35:51 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from fed.local (fed.local [127.0.0.1]) by fed.local (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nACMaBBi021882 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:36:11 +0100 Original-Received: (from xavier@localhost) by fed.local (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nACMaAKh021878; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:36:10 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: fed.local: xavier set sender to xma@gnu.org using -f In-reply-to: <4AFBC50D.1060007@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:19:25 +0100) User-Agent: Rmail GNU emacs 23.1 on cat: /etc/slackware-version: No such file or directory Jabber-ID: xavier@maillard.im X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116911 Archived-At: > When showing a *completions* buffer in a new window opened for > it (TAB in find-file minibuffer for instance), I wonder why the > window doesn't get deleted when completion has finished. For > instance, when an existing file is found, the *Completions* > buffer is buried, but I see a split frame with the original > buffer in the top window and _some other_ buffer in the lower > window. Shouldn't the window for the completions buffer be > removed whenever it has been popped up just for the buffer? This should not happen and doesn't happen with my older builds. Could you please (1) make sure that the behavior also happens with Emacs -Q, (2) try to find out when it appeared for the first time, and (3) make a corresponding bug report. Gha, I did not notice he was talking about a *window*. Sorry for the noise. At least I tested my code and it worked. :D Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org