unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
Cc: david.reitter@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: completions - remove window after use?
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:36:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911122236.nACMaAKh021878@fed.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AFBC50D.1060007@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:19:25 +0100)


    > When showing a *completions* buffer in a new window opened for
    > it (TAB in find-file minibuffer for instance), I wonder why the
    > window doesn't get deleted when completion has finished.  For
    > instance, when an existing file is found, the *Completions*
    > buffer is buried, but I see a split frame with the original
    > buffer in the top window and _some other_ buffer in the lower
    > window.  Shouldn't the window for the completions buffer be
    > removed whenever it has been popped up just for the buffer?

   This should not happen and doesn't happen with my older builds.  Could
   you please (1) make sure that the behavior also happens with Emacs -Q,
   (2) try to find out when it appeared for the first time, and (3) make a
   corresponding bug report.

Gha, I did not notice he was talking about a *window*. Sorry for
the noise. At least I tested my code and it worked. :D

	Xavier
-- 
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.april.org
http://www.lolica.org




      reply	other threads:[~2009-11-12 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-11 19:45 completions - remove window after use? David Reitter
2009-11-11 20:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-11 21:26   ` Štěpán Němec
2009-11-11 23:21     ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-12  9:57       ` Vertical completions (was: completions - remove window after use?) Juri Linkov
2009-11-12 10:09         ` Deniz Dogan
2009-11-17 17:45           ` Vertical completions Juri Linkov
2009-11-18  8:11             ` martin rudalics
2009-11-18  9:59               ` Juri Linkov
2009-11-18  9:47             ` Backward completions (was: Vertical completions) Juri Linkov
2009-11-18 15:06               ` Drew Adams
2009-11-18 15:47                 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-11-18 19:02                   ` Backward completions Juri Linkov
2009-11-18 19:36                     ` Lennart Borgman
2009-11-19 17:36                       ` Juri Linkov
2009-11-19 17:58                         ` Lennart Borgman
2009-11-19 18:24                         ` Drew Adams
2009-11-20  9:27                           ` Juri Linkov
2009-11-20 17:29                           ` Juri Linkov
2009-11-20 17:49                             ` Lennart Borgman
2009-11-20 21:26                             ` Drew Adams
2009-11-18 15:45               ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-18 19:01                 ` Juri Linkov
2009-11-18 19:50               ` Backward completions (was: Vertical completions) Dan Nicolaescu
2009-11-19 17:32                 ` Backward completions Juri Linkov
2009-11-19 18:29                   ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-11-19 18:36                     ` Drew Adams
2009-11-19 19:26                       ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-11-19 19:30                         ` Drew Adams
2009-11-18  9:52             ` switch-to-completions (was: Vertical completions) Juri Linkov
2009-11-18 15:48               ` switch-to-completions Stefan Monnier
2009-11-18 19:04                 ` switch-to-completions Juri Linkov
2009-11-19  1:12                   ` switch-to-completions Stefan Monnier
2009-11-12 10:29         ` Vertical completions (was: completions - remove window after use?) Štěpán Němec
2009-11-12 19:26         ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-11-12 22:00           ` Lennart Borgman
2009-11-12 13:30       ` completions - remove window after use? Lluís
2009-11-12 14:40         ` David Reitter
2009-11-12 15:15         ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-14  0:30           ` Richard Stallman
2009-11-12  3:00 ` Xavier Maillard
2009-11-12  8:19 ` martin rudalics
2009-11-12 22:36   ` Xavier Maillard [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200911122236.nACMaAKh021878@fed.local \
    --to=xma@gnu.org \
    --cc=david.reitter@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=rudalics@gmx.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).