From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to recognize keyboard insertion? Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:03:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20091102050341.GA8560@tomas> References: <83vdhvd096.fsf@gnu.org> <4AEC6CC5.3010009@harpegolden.net> <83skczcwes.fsf@gnu.org> <4AEC75C3.900@harpegolden.net> <83r5sjctup.fsf@gnu.org> <20091101054444.GA12747@tomas> <83d442cc9d.fsf@gnu.org> <4AEDEAEF.2020501@harpegolden.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1257138015 3209 80.91.229.12 (2 Nov 2009 05:00:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 05:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , tomas@tuxteam.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David De La Harpe Golden Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 02 06:00:08 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N4p1T-0004Zw-P8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:00:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38420 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N4p1S-0008Ni-Pz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N4p1N-0008M4-4A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N4p1I-0008Hz-GX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51089 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N4p1I-0008Hp-9n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:59:56 -0500 Original-Received: from alextrapp1.equinoxe.de ([217.22.192.104]:53845 helo=www.elogos.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N4p1F-0000q3-6C; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:59:53 -0500 Original-Received: by www.elogos.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D007D90008; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:03:41 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AEDEAEF.2020501@harpegolden.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116566 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 08:09:19PM +0000, David De La Harpe Golden wrote: > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> Maybe so, but UAX#9 treats European digits and Arabic digits >> differently. They have different bidirectional properties. Thanks for the info. Every day something new, I guess :-) > The eastern arabic digits U+06F0 to U+06F9 and usual western digits U+0= 030=20 > to U+0039 do have separate code point ranges. Apparently > the former code points are less used - the arabic keyboard layout retur= ns=20 > the western codes for the 0-9 keypresses. > > gtk+/pango seems to be choosing to merely _display_ the latter with the= =20 > glyphs of the former depending on surrounding language. [...] Yes, that's how I imagined things work, from my limited experience. Seems my view was a bit na=C3=AFve. Thanks for the insights - -- tom=C3=A1s -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFK7mgtBcgs9XrR2kYRAkURAJ4vEqgx7PQdJz2Z+8xBklx5Bi3EGQCdH+09 KKdXu41zDoubLwjP1Q13Yz8=3D =3DdJrR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----