From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELCFILES [was Re: Updating org-mode in Emacs] Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 11:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <200908081851.n78IpxmX006129@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> References: <83my6bn0ol.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249757733 24104 80.91.229.12 (8 Aug 2009 18:55:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 18:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 08 20:55:26 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MZr4d-0000GS-B1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 20:55:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46087 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MZr4c-0006sO-Ni for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MZr4X-0006s1-Mm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:55:17 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MZr4S-0006qx-62 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:55:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51267 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MZr4S-0006qr-0n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:55:12 -0400 Original-Received: from barrelv2.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.114]:60628) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MZr4P-0004sD-9z; Sat, 08 Aug 2009 14:55:09 -0400 Original-Received: from godzilla.ics.uci.edu (godzilla.ics.uci.edu [128.195.10.101]) by barrelv2.ics.uci.edu (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n78Iq1lo014885; Sat, 8 Aug 2009 11:52:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: (from dann@localhost) by godzilla.ics.uci.edu (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id n78IpxmX006129; Sat, 8 Aug 2009 11:51:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Sat, 08 Aug 2009 09:03:58 +0200") Original-Lines: 17 X-ICS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ICS-MailScanner-ID: n78Iq1lo014885 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@godzilla.ics.uci.edu X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113810 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Glenn Morris writes: > > > It was the only way I could find to allow parallel byte-compiling that > > was compatible with portable Makefile syntax. I certainly appreciate > > the speed-up that allows. > > Parallel byte-compiling without proper dependencies following > require/load does not work anyway. You can get random build failures > when one process is writing the same elc file while another one is > reading it. Then can't we just not read elc files when byte compiling, just read the original elisp? If this is not acceptable all the time, we could at least do it when bootstrapping... Didn't someone mention patch to implement this behavior?